Speculation Motown's hysterical and annoying, but traditional, totally unfounded Summer 2017 rumours thread

[FIF]

And Plan B is to make Plan A work if it doesn't.

and plan C is to fire the manager and then try to make plan A work with his assistant.

 

[big_mac4824]

Schmeikel
Simpson Huth/Morgan McGuire Chilwell
Mahrez Ndidi Drinkwater Albrighton
Gray Vardy

Capable replacements given decent management, rotations, plans B and C
Amarte Mende (?) Fuchs Okasaki Kapuska (?)

I would like to see us sign an infuential, hard working, proven midfielder, to rotate within the existing group, or two if Mahrez leaves.
Any more signings would make integration difficult, like last season.
Plan long term (hopefully without having to panick in January) by introducing promising existing new young players while seeking out a top quality central defender and striker to introduce at the end of the season.
To be a premier league manager!

I think he has already started trying to bring in young talent, I would not write off Drinkwater just yet Ndidi I expect to go up another level this season. If some of the rumours are true we are looking at the right players

 

[FIF]

Schmeikel
Simpson Huth/Morgan McGuire Chilwell
Mahrez Ndidi Drinkwater Albrighton
Gray Vardy

hopefully closer than Miles team.

we'll sadly stick to 442

perhaps:

Kasper

new RB not yet signed
Mcguire/new CB not yet signed
Huth
Chilwell

Albrighton
Ndidi
Drinkwater
Gray

New no.10 not yet signed
Vardy

So 3 new players and 2 squad players coming into the starting team for the first game. It's a lot of change but needed after last year's foolish stagnation.

Bench: new keeper not yet signed, Fuchs, Amartey, Maguire/new CB, Slimani, Lawrence.

 

[Blaarev]

For the record (and hopefully future use); his name is Maguire.

 

[City Fan]

For the record (and hopefully future use); his name is Maguire.

There was me thinking we were being linked with some Scottish guy.

 

[homer]

Phil McAvity or Ben Doon ?

 

[FIF]

For the record (and hopefully future use); his name is Maguire.

I know, but didn't want Red Leicester to feel bad. what about mende, amarte and kapuska? Are you just selective or weren't you sure?

 

[FIF]

Phil McAvity or Ben Doon ?

you know city fan well?

 

[SJN-Fox]

you know city fan well?

This is Homer you're talking about. He knows everybody well!

 

[Blaarev]

I know, but didn't want Red Leicester to feel bad. what about mende, amarte and kapuska? Are you just selective or weren't you sure?

Selective

 

[City Fan]

I know, but didn't want Red Leicester to feel bad. what about mende, amarte and kapuska? Are you just selective or weren't you sure?

What about Schmeikel?

 

[City Fan]

you know city fan well?

Ho ho ho.

 

[Blaarev]

What about Schmeikel?

All those and Okasaki

 

[FIF]

What about Schmeikel?

Thay's far too difficult for me to spell. I stick to Kasper.

 

[FIF]

All those and Okasaki

Yet only Mcguire/Maguire worried you.

 

[Blaarev]

Yet only Mcguire/Maguire worried you.

Can't say I was, or is, particulary worried. Well, at least not about spelling. Kaputsa/Kaputska and the others are in many ways more or less lost cases long ago anyway.

 

[lazzer]

Mirazz

 

[Blaarev]

N'Kante

 

[popillius]

You've stopped your brain functioning. I've never said it's due to the Full backs. In case you still don't understand I've repeatedly said we need 2 CBs an RB and Chilwell to replace Fuchs along with other changes. The whole defence except, at times Kasper and Huth and the original poor work rate of the midfield made us defensively shit. I'd replace most of the defence. Just because you have a jobbie for Simpson and Fuchs you seem to want to blame no-one at all for our disastrous season. The only person I've seen you blame other than Ranieri is Danny Drinkwater...

Of course, if you'd bothered to read my post or anyone else's correctly you would have seen that I, and many others, wanted to change both CBs and didn't think there was an issue or quite the issue you've invented at least, about our full backs. You then posted that ridiculous statistic in response. The only possible conclusion is that you were apportioning blame for those numbers to the only people I didn't agree we should change.

You're so predictably boring but at least the drivel is consistent so we know what to expect.

 

[FIF]

Of course, if you'd bothered to read my post or anyone else's correctly you would have seen that I, and many others, wanted to change both CBs and didn't think there was an issue or quite the issue you've invented at least, about our full backs. You then posted that ridiculous statistic in response. The only possible conclusion is that you were apportioning blame for those numbers to the only people I didn't agree we should change.

You're so predictably boring but at least the drivel is consistent so we know what to expect.

So you're admitting that you're arguing about nothing apart from feeling inferior or insecure?

Your conclusion is insane. How can we need 2CBs, an RB and an LB with the first CB as the greatest priority be understood by someone with even half a functioning braincell to mean that I'm apportioning blame to the 2 FBs? It means that I'm apportioning blame to the whole of the defence (along with parts of the midfield and attack as shown in nuerous posts).

You need to sort your head out or you'll be on the daggers road.

I also love how you use "we" when you're the only one saying it. Do you have a dual identity problem?