Neil Lennon

Log in to stop seeing adverts
This page may contain links to companies such as eBay and Amazon. As an affiliate of these sites I may earn commission if you click the link and make a purchase

Status
Not open for further replies.
Neil Lennon is nearly as silly an idea as Steve Walsh is.

However..

City Fan said:
Micky Adams?

After all, he is our only manager since MON to have come out with any form of credibility......

:icon_wink
Click to expand...

Had he not been here before he'd be a great choice in my opinion.

But he has so we'll probably get Peter Reid.
 
you see now i was thinking of getting guppy, muzzy and savage back for one final season, so having lennon as well would be the icing on the cake
 
appointing Dowie would be a disaster IMO, like starting from square one only to wind up in the shit again...

but what do I know? I was one of those against appointing Warnock and while we cannot prove he would have done the business here, that was probably a stupid idea...
 
I am not surprised to see threads such as this being started but sorry to say it's ludicrous to hear so many people clutching at straws suggesting yet another change in management.
I know IH has his faults but I firmly believe that 6 months is not long enough for him to get it right so we should stick with him and hopefully he will guide us to a quick return to championship football.
 
Stevie Lynex on the wing said:
I am not surprised to see threads such as this being started but sorry to say it's ludicrous to hear so many people clutching at straws suggesting yet another change in management.
I know IH has his faults but I firmly believe that 6 months is not long enough for him to get it right so we should stick with him and hopefully he will guide us to a quick return to championship football.
Click to expand...

top comment here.
 
people overate experience, megosn holloway both experienced managers but bad. Keane experienced manager prior to sunderland?
 
Taggs, yeah he'll do.
 
Stevie Lynex on the wing said:
I know IH has his faults but I firmly believe that 6 months is not long enough for him to get it right .
Click to expand...

Yes - I think Holloway's record over the last six months is so encouraging that he should be given at least a five years contract with an option for him to exercise the right for a further five years, should he want to stay.

I think its a really brilliant idea that we should back failure - let's have Leicester City ruling the Conference with 30,000 fans each week waving their shoes at Ollie.

Thanks for your wisdom.
 
It's the fact that we are worse and going down which must end his tenure.
 
Redditch Fox said:
Yes - I think Holloway's record over the last six months is so encouraging that he should be given at least a five years contract with an option for him to exercise the right for a further five years, should he want to stay.

I think its a really brilliant idea that we should back failure - let's have Leicester City ruling the Conference with 30,000 fans each week waving their shoes at Ollie.

Thanks for your wisdom.
Click to expand...

I would love to think that chucking Holloway out would guarantee our temporary return to the Championship (passing straight through and up to the Premiership). I would love to believe in the tooth fairy and Father Christmas but, surely facts speak for themselves: change for change's sake only makes matters worse. IF Billy Davies were to be willing to come to the club, then, maybe change. He has a better record than Holloway but, unless we have a manager of that quality lined up (and how many good managers leap at the chance of taking on a third division club?) sacking Holloway is just venting our collective spleen.
 
Diken said:
I would love to think that chucking Holloway out would guarantee our temporary return to the Championship (passing straight through and up to the Premiership). I would love to believe in the tooth fairy and Father Christmas but, surely facts speak for themselves: change for change's sake only makes matters worse. IF Billy Davies were to be willing to come to the club, then, maybe change. He has a better record than Holloway but, unless we have a manager of that quality lined up (and how many good managers leap at the chance of taking on a third division club?) sacking Holloway is just venting our collective spleen.
Click to expand...


I can't believe some people actually think we should keep the fool.

Morons singing 'Ollies Army' kept him in a job and got us relegeted.

MM got flack over sacking Allen. This time has kept Ian Holloway based on the apparant wish of the fans.

Weeks ago when it was obvious he was clueless the slightest turn on him by the fans would of given MM what he wanted.

I'd struggle to find a worse manager
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

P Pld Pts
1Liverpool2253
2Arsenal2347
3Nottm F2344
4Manchester C  2341
5Newcastle2341
6Chelsea2340
7Bournemouth2340
8Aston Villa2337
9Brighton2334
10Fulham2333
11Brentford2331
12Manchester U2329
13Palace2327
14West Ham2327
15Tottenham 2324
16Everton2223
17Leicester2317
18Wolves2316
19Ipswich2316
20Southampton236

Latest posts

Back
Top