NEIL SHIPPERLY!!!!!

[alex]

Re: NEIL SHIPPERLEY

Get him out, get him out, get him out, we dont need this, it realy annoys me

After 6 posts it really annoys you huh?

 

[LCFCfan MUDA]

NEIL SHIPPERLEY

:smt067 :smt067 :smt068 :smt070 :smt097 :smt097

 

[Steven]

Re: NEIL SHIPPERLEY

:smt067 :smt067 :smt068 :smt070 :smt097 :smt097

:smt030 :smt033 :smt109 ;-) :mrgreen:

 

[alex]

Re: NEIL SHIPPERLEY

:smt067 :smt067 :smt068 :smt070 :smt097 :smt097

Your use of emoticons is really too good for me to compete with. Well played. Another emoticon-shy LCFC fan put to rights... You de man....

 

[Steven]

Re: NEIL SHIPPERLEY

:smt067 :smt067 :smt068 :smt070 :smt097 :smt097

Your use of emoticons is really too good for me to compete with. Well played. Another emoticon-shy LCFC fan put to rights... You de man....

You can't give up just because you are "emoticon-shy". ;-) :mrgreen: :smt023

 

[alex]

OK... :-D :? :mrgreen: :smt008 :smt007 :smt006 :smt005 :smt004 :?: :roll: ;-) :smt020 :smt019 :smt014 :smt018 :smt012 :smt006 :smt035 :smt031 :smt034 :smt028 :smt075 :smt071 :smt072 :smt072 :smt076 :smt059 :smt063 :smt078 :smt082 :smt096 :smt092 :smt088 :smt084 :smt100 :smt114 :smt111 :smt117 :smt113 :smt109 :smt118

 

[alex]

No offence meant to you LCFC by the way - didn't mean to be mean... I agree it is totally frustrating.

 

[Steven]

OK... :-D :? :mrgreen: :smt008 :smt007 :smt006 :smt005 :smt004 :?: :roll: ;-) :smt020 :smt019 :smt014 :smt018 :smt012 :smt006 :smt035 :smt031 :smt034 :smt028 :smt075 :smt071 :smt072 :smt072 :smt076 :smt059 :smt063 :smt078 :smt082 :smt096 :smt092 :smt088 :smt084 :smt100 :smt114 :smt111 :smt117 :smt113 :smt109 :smt118

One can of course go from one extreme to the other. :roll: :smt083 :smt103 :smt107

 

[drummindefender]

the difference for me between this story and the trundle one is that im not dissapointed that this isn't true :-D 8) ;-)

 

[Steven]

the difference for me between this story and the trundle one is that im not dissapointed that this isn't true :-D 8) ;-)

... except I think the Trundle hoax was better. I suppose I would say that as I believed it for about 20 mins. :roll: :? :? :? :-( This one on the other hand, I did not believe for a nanosecond. :roll: ;-) :mrgreen:

 

[drummindefender]

i'm still upset that trundle rumour was a hoax

 

[pipes]

i'm still upset that trundle rumour was a hoax

have you seen him play? he is very lethargic and doesn't contribute much to the game. his skill is good - but that only shows through because of the standard of defenders he is playing against, he really would be no use to LCFC.

 

[lcfcrules]

i'm still upset that trundle rumour was a hoax

have you seen him play? he is very lethargic and doesn't contribute much to the game. his skill is good - but that only shows through because of the standard of defenders he is playing against, he really would be no use to LCFC.

agree, seems like a player who only performs when he is up for it or when he feels like it. Not the type that we need, as we already have enough of such players in our squad.

 

[drummindefender]

yes he has got good skills, but he did score some good goals in the fa cup and the league last year!