Blaarev
Well-Known Member
Is that Kelly Brook nowadays?
Is that Kelly Brook nowadays?
Well, the proof will be seen in about 45 minutes I guess.It depends whether you want a committed team or not?
Every time Maddison or Barnes are on the pitch, I feel physically sick. The contempt they have for the club is extraordinary. They play for themselves only.
They are not alone and some of the scumbags remain in the side, but this is a positive step forward at last.
Keep it ****ing tight. We are as loose as a wizards cuff.Think we will be trying to keep it tight for an hour then bring on Maddison and Barnes.
They've been shite of late. However, of all our players, the odds of either of those two winning you a game are double or more than the rest of our lot put together right now.It depends whether you want a committed team or not?
Every time Maddison or Barnes are on the pitch, I feel physically sick. The contempt they have for the club is extraordinary. They play for themselves only.
They are not alone and some of the scumbags remain in the side, but this is a positive step forward at last.
He’s basically just said as much. Good options on the benchThink we will be trying to keep it tight for an hour then bring on Maddison and Barnes.
You hang around in strange circles.Keep it ****ing tight. We are as loose as a wizards chuff.
That’s the spirit. Come on City.Soumare man of the match.
Actually, this is a very good point. I'd forgotten about that.Only game we’ve won since Feb was Wolves without Maddison and Barnes
They've been shite of late. However, of all our players, the odds of either of those two winning you a game are double or more than the rest of our lot put together right now.
Like it or not, they are two of our best players and leaving them out makes us less likely to score goals.
We could play two up front and offer them support from some players behind who can actually pass a ball forward.You wanted a front two. You've got your front two.
If you played them plus Barnes and Maddison we'd be ripped to shreds. Even a Man City side wouldn't go to Newcastle with four players that don't track back at all.
We may well get hammered anyway but at least he's trying to do something.
Erm.... does it have to be one or the other? I must've missed those rules.People wanted two strikers and then moan when Maddison and Barnes aren’t playing…
Not that it makes a blind bit of difference… 4-0 incoming
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 16 | 39 |
2 | Chelsea | 17 | 35 |
3 | Arsenal | 17 | 33 |
4 | Nottm F | 17 | 31 |
5 | Bournemouth | 17 | 28 |
6 | Aston Villa | 17 | 28 |
7 | Manchester C | 17 | 27 |
8 | Newcastle | 17 | 26 |
9 | Fulham | 17 | 25 |
10 | Brighton | 17 | 25 |
11 | Tottenham | 17 | 23 |
12 | Brentford | 17 | 23 |
13 | Manchester U | 17 | 22 |
14 | West Ham | 17 | 20 |
15 | Everton | 16 | 16 |
16 | Palace | 17 | 16 |
17 | Leicester | 17 | 14 |
18 | Wolves | 17 | 12 |
19 | Ipswich | 17 | 12 |
20 | Southampton | 17 | 6 |