Steven
Active Member
Bristol C fans have changed their tune. :icon_bigg
http://www.otib.co.uk/index.php?/forum/31-football-chat/
http://www.otib.co.uk/index.php?/forum/31-football-chat/
Maynard is NOT a 20-goal-a-season striker - he is a striker that scored 20 goals in one season - a big difference...
I do wonder now whether Maynard will be rethinking his stance on staying at Ashton Gate
Bristol C fans have changed their tune. :icon_bigg
http://www.otib.co.uk/index.php?/forum/31-football-chat/
I've got genuine reason to believe that Maynard has not the slightest wish to stay at Bristol City. He wants out and it is the club who are keeping him there. I don't think it's likely that he'll put himself out for them in forthcoming games, with the intent of forcing their hand. If that doesn't work and he's still down there after 10 games or so, he'll start making the effort so as to ensure he's got a prominent place in the shop window by the end of the season. The consolation of having waited will for him be a greater signing on fee - Bristol City will get sweet **** all and it is they who should be urgently rethinking their stance.
I still think he is the likeliest new arrival of the ones that have been speculated on.
I've got genuine reason to believe that Maynard has not the slightest wish to stay at Bristol City. He wants out and it is the club who are keeping him there. I don't think it's likely that he'll put himself out for them in forthcoming games, with the intent of forcing their hand. If that doesn't work and he's still down there after 10 games or so, he'll start making the effort so as to ensure he's got a prominent place in the shop window by the end of the season. The consolation of having waited will for him be a greater signing on fee - Bristol City will get sweet **** all and it is they who should be urgently rethinking their stance.
I still think he is the likeliest new arrival of the ones that have been speculated on.
A very good point on his intentions, the press releases coming out of Ashton Gate have been ambiguous to say the very least and this includes Maynard himself. I firmly believe he has wanted out of Bristol City since the end of last season but has been hitherto holding out for a Premiership club coming in for him rather than a club in the same division, with an offer not forthcoming he just wants out to whoever offers enough cash. It looks likely that that 'whoever' will be us but he needs to put in a transfer request before anything happens quickly as his chairman seems rather stubborn.
The player has no need to put in a transfer request; the club know he wants out and there is no advantage for him of putting in a formal request. The stubbornness of the chairman is the problem; he and his club are losing out because of it.
The player has no need to put in a transfer request; the club know he wants out and there is no advantage for him of putting in a formal request. The stubbornness of the chairman is the problem; he and his club are losing out because of it.
A minor point, but the player normally gets a percentage of the transfer fee so it would be in his interest to ensure he is sold before his contract expires. Whether he would forego this by putting in a transfer request is perhaps in the fine print.The player has no need to put in a transfer request; the club know he wants out and there is no advantage for him of putting in a formal request. The stubbornness of the chairman is the problem; he and his club are losing out because of it.
A minor point, but the player normally gets a percentage of the transfer fee so it would be in his interest to ensure he is sold before his contract expires.
But in a year, once he's inevitably taken you up, he could look forward to another large sweetener when you sell him on to the Jacks.But if he waits until his contract expires, there won't be a transfer fee - and the employing club will be able to afford to pay him a bigger signing-on fee.
A minor point, but the player normally gets a percentage of the transfer fee.
I hear Cov are interested and will be making an offer tomorrow.
On the whole most players have a clause which pays them a percentage of any sell on fee. Differs from case to case. I have no evidence for this but have read/heard it many times and taken it to be the norm.Is that right?
Scoop.Money grabbing bastards.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 21 | 50 |
2 | Arsenal | 22 | 44 |
3 | Nottm F | 22 | 44 |
4 | Manchester C | 22 | 38 |
5 | Newcastle | 22 | 38 |
6 | Chelsea | 21 | 37 |
7 | Bournemouth | 22 | 37 |
8 | Aston Villa | 22 | 36 |
9 | Brighton | 22 | 34 |
10 | Fulham | 22 | 33 |
11 | Brentford | 22 | 28 |
12 | Palace | 22 | 27 |
13 | Manchester U | 22 | 26 |
14 | West Ham | 22 | 26 |
15 | Tottenham | 22 | 24 |
16 | Everton | 21 | 20 |
17 | Wolves | 21 | 16 |
18 | Ipswich | 22 | 16 |
19 | Leicester | 22 | 14 |
20 | Southampton | 22 | 6 |