NP puts in bid for Hobbs

Log in to stop seeing adverts
This page may contain links to companies such as eBay and Amazon. As an affiliate of these sites I may earn commission if you click the link and make a purchase

Status
Not open for further replies.
Absolute dream. Hobbs and Tunhcev next season with Morrison and Kisnorbo as back up, that is worthy of the championship and even the premier league (actually to far). But if this is true then it is certainly good news, i thought he struggled at first but recently he has been quality and will definetly play in the Premier league when he is older.

He has the potential to become a future England captain according to some :icon_lol:
 
He has the potential to become a future England captain according to some :icon_lol:

He's making a return to cricket then :icon_wink


5717566_std.jpg
 
Last edited:
I don't want to be a miserable old git but if Liverpool let him go for £400k it indicates that they don't think he's any kop(sic)..... if they rate him at all then they will ask for serious 'add on's'.

NP has done the right thing of course (as he usually does) - but I fear that at that sort of price it may invite other bidders to get involved.
 
I don't want to be a miserable old git but if Liverpool let him go for £400k it indicates that they don't think he's any kop(sic)

It's a cute play on words, but the 'sic' is only appropriate if you're quoting somebody else's work verbatim.
 
It's a cute play on words, but the 'sic' is only appropriate if you're quoting somebody else's work verbatim.

Thanks Macky. Your grammar primers are always much appreciated - in this case, I did know but as you imply I couldn't resist the play on words.
 
I would imagine if, and I say 'if' we sign him then the £400k would merely be downpayment, the add-ons would be huge.
 
I would imagine if, and I say 'if' we sign him then the £400k would merely be downpayment, the add-ons would be huge.
Why, he is after all only a £400k player at best. We don't know what he will be like in the championship.
He is not a premiership player by a long way that's why those red ***** don't want him.
 
if Liverpool let him go for £400k, don't be surprised to see a 50% sell-on clause
 
I'm not really bothered about sell on clauses. it would only be a percentage of any profit, meaning his valued would have been increased by excellent performances.

It's win win for everyone.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

P Pld Pts
1Liverpool2150
2Arsenal2244
3Nottm F2244
4Chelsea2240
5Manchester C  2238
6Newcastle2238
7Bournemouth2237
8Aston Villa2236
9Brighton2234
10Fulham2233
11Brentford2228
12Palace2227
13Manchester U2226
14West Ham2226
15Tottenham 2224
16Everton2120
17Wolves2216
18Ipswich2216
19Leicester2214
20Southampton226

Latest posts

Back
Top