Paul Gallagher

[teblin]

One of the better footballers we have, but not sure where his best position is and i'm not sure pearson is either. He didn't play well on saturday but put some very good crosses/corners into the box which we nearly scored from.

 

[Blue Maniac]

One sub-par performance and you want him killed. Madness.

 

[alex]

Spot on Maniac.

 

[Kingy_85]

If i were Paul Gallagher and i came on here and read this id be absolutely gutted and baffled.

To call him a "complete waste of space" is insane.

 

[shanomac28]

PG is a decent creative player, i agree with the person who said he would be best suited in yanns role behind the strikers tho, think we would see the best of him there as well as the front 2 thriving off the service. it doesnt always have to come from the wings, its great we can mix up the play and arent one dimensional.. certainly not a waste of space!

fiver gallagher scores against the trees on satday!

 

[Blue Maniac]

PG is a decent creative player, i agree with the person who said he would be best suited in yanns role behind the strikers tho, think we would see the best of him there as well as the front 2 thriving off the service. it doesnt always have to come from the wings, its great we can mix up the play and arent one dimensional.. certainly not a waste of space!

fiver gallagher scores against the trees on satday!

No offence, Shano, but this post hurts my eyes. I agree though, PG will be great.

 

[Miles Away]

I rate Gallagher, but agree, he is a bit of a tricky player to figure out where to play.

That said, I think he deserves to be in the team at the moment.

 

[FoxCovert]

I agree with Teblin on this, he does have quality but i don't think Pearson can find his right position. I would like to see him played as a striker