Speculation Peltier

Log in to stop seeing adverts

Status
Not open for further replies.
Doesn't this sound like - " As you have mouthed off previously that you want out, now put in an official transfer request & lose any pay offs you might have been entitled to, then we will agree a fee with another club"

- if so, sounds a good bit of management to me
 
Doesn't this sound like - " As you have mouthed off previously that you want out, now put in an official transfer request & lose any pay offs you might have been entitled to, then we will agree a fee with another club"

- if so, sounds a good bit of management to me

What pay-offs would those be?
 
A loyalty bonus? For 1 seasons service, **** this game!!
 
It's not for 1 season. It's for the other seasons he'd have played if he hadn't been sold while under contract.

God bless him for potentially seeing out his highly lucrative contract, such admirable service to his employers should be highly rewarded.
 
It's the people who pay silly money for tickets and Sky subscriptions that ultimately are to blame for the money players get. You can't blame them for taking the going rate.

I'm blaming everyone, It's totally ridiculous.
 
It's the people who pay silly money for tickets and Sky subscriptions that ultimately are to blame for the money players get. You can't blame them for taking the going rate.

Of course you can. **** those greedy ****s. They should insist on being paid no more than £50 per week to stay grounded and in touch with the common folk..
 
Of course you can. **** those greedy ****s. They should insist on being paid no more than £50 per week to stay grounded and in touch with the common folk..

They can't win. Marlon King was in touch with a common folk and look what happened to him. His farts don't make a sound now.
 
Per the Koren thread
Meanwhile, Lee Peltier has been left in limbo after City rejected offers from Leeds and Huddersfield for the full-back.

The defender has told City he wants to leave, but the club are holding out for close to the £750,000 they paid Huddersfield last summer.

Peltier had hoped to be able to speak to both clubs but City have refused him permission until they accept an offer, which now looks unlikely as the Terriers' interest seems to have cooled and Leeds are exploring alternative targets.
 
Sky Sports saying Leeds have made an 'official' approach.

Good - unfortunately for Pelts he was just one of many bad buys last season - simply not good enough.

Would be perfect as a regular right-back for a Peterborough or a Barnsley but for a club chasing those elusive two promotion spots? No.
 
Good - unfortunately for Pelts he was just one of many bad buys last season - simply not good enough.

Would be perfect as a regular right-back for a Peterborough or a Barnsley but for a club chasing those elusive two promotion spots? No.
I tend to agree with you, but the purchase at the time made sense, with him coming from a pretty good Huddersfield team. The hope was that he would kick on from that, but for whatever reasons he didn't.
 
Peltier was half decent untill Gally came beck from injury, he dare not cross the halfway line after that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

P Pld Pts
1Liverpool1128
2Manchester C  1123
3Chelsea1119
4Arsenal1119
5Nottm F1119
6Brighton1119
7Fulham1118
8Newcastle1118
9Aston Villa1118
10Tottenham 1116
11Brentford1116
12Bournemouth1115
13Manchester U1115
14West Ham1112
15Leicester1110
16Everton1110
17Ipswich118
18Palace117
19Wolves116
20Southampton114

Latest posts

Back
Top