Matt_B
Well-Known Member
Are now online http://www.league-ratings.co.uk
Melton Fox said:Maybe it is still just me. But again, I thought Maybury was awful. Get rid.
1st point about accusing me of me booing. Only 1 answer i'm afraid, and I will come down to your level (using the same tone that you used towards me) so you understand it. Get Fooked!!PONTUS KAAMARK said:I bet you booed at half time didnt you.
Maybury is a good player who I thought played well today. He struggled because Stearman wasnt fit and couldnt get forward and overlap.
Melton Fox said:1st point about accusing me of me booing. Only 1 answer i'm afraid, and I will come down to your level (using the same tone that you used towards me) so you understand it. Get Fooked!!
2nd point. You have contradicted yourself in one sentance. "Maybury played well today" & "He struggled"
Not the basis for a good argument is it?
Don't you just luv this talking balls site when you get god old banter like this.Melton Fox said:I am a realist, I run 2 businesses. I need to concentrate on the negative aspects and improve them. Yes it's nice getting compliments, but they aren't very constructive. I focus on Maybury, Williams and Hughes because in my opinion they are the key areas that require improvement
Think about what I post. - Get real. Do you really think when I made my first post, I for one minute expected to get accused of booing. I saw no connection to compare me to them. Thanks for the apology though.
Hull didn't have any joy down the left simply because they are shite. Not because Maybury was good
Maybury put a good move on Rogers in the second half, granted. But then proceeded to scuff his shot. There is no point in doing half a job. If you don't get the results, the efforts were pointless
As I have stated in a previous post about Maybury. I am prepared to accept that my opinion is in the minority. I am not prepared to accept that I am wrong
Indeed, I think it is because on talking balls we have some "fairly" intelligent people (exceptions accounted for) with passionate views and remain convicted to their views, without being swayed by peer pressure. We can have a good banter without name calling (sometimes) and in general it is all good.Stevie Lynex on the wing said:Don't you just luv this talking balls site when you get god old banter like this.
alex said:I've always loved the idea of a three-in-a-bed with John Inman and Hulk Hogan...
Melton Fox said:Indeed, I think it is because on talking balls we have some "fairly" intelligent people (exceptions accounted for) with passionate views and remain convicted to their views, without being swayed by peer pressure. We can have a good banter without name calling (sometimes) and in general it is all good.
Or does it just look this way because other LCFC sites have an average mentality of a bent paper clip and the intelligence of a dead squirrel?
beighton155 said:In all honesty I though Maybury had a mare yesterday. He has had a poor season, but he looked aloth better on the wing until yesterday, so I am prepared to accept he maybe had an off day. If Stearman wasn't fit, as Pontarse said, then we should have had Maybury at RB and Sylla down the right. Maybury was playing Right Wing, and was not often further forward than the halfway.
PFKAKTF FOX said:I do feel that we look more solid down the right hand side with him and Stearman as oppose to somebody like Momo. One thing I will say is that Maybury's attitude and commitment has been first class since Levein left the club.
Melton Fox said:I am a realist, I run 2 businesses. I need to concentrate on the negative aspects and improve them. Yes it's nice getting compliments, but they aren't very constructive. I focus on Maybury, Williams and Hughes because in my opinion they are the key areas that require improvement
Think about what I post. - Get real. Do you really think when I made my first post, I for one minute expected to get accused of booing. I saw no connection to compare me to them. Thanks for the apology though.
Hull didn't have any joy down the left simply because they are shite. Not because Maybury was good
Maybury put a good move on Rogers in the second half, granted. But then proceeded to scuff his shot. There is no point in doing half a job. If you don't get the results, the efforts were pointless
As I have stated in a previous post about Maybury. I am prepared to accept that my opinion is in the minority. I am not prepared to accept that I am wrong
PONTUS KAAMARK said:I seem to remember that Hull yesterday gave our left hand side a bit of a grilling. The first goal came from it and this pattern continued throughout the whole match, unlike the right hand side which has nicely marshalled by Maybury and Stearman.
Lboro fox said:Thats the main crux of the problem IMO, maybury is ok for me, but our left hand side is terrible, an out of position left back being covered by an out of position midfielder will cause us problems all season. We can probably get away with it if at least one of them is in thier natural position.
Fingers crossed that Brevett and Welsh are the answer, both looked good yesterday too.
Lboro fox said:Thats the main crux of the problem IMO, maybury is ok for me, but our left hand side is terrible, an out of position left back being covered by an out of position midfielder will cause us problems all season. We can probably get away with it if at least one of them is in thier natural position.
Fingers crossed that Brevett and Welsh are the answer, both looked good yesterday too.
If not Maybury? I don't know. I might be tempted to play Maybury at RB and push Stearman forward. Other option is to bring Smith over to the right (if still with us), Welsh on the left. Maybury to the bench.PONTUS KAAMARK said:Ok if if you dont play Maybury whats the answer? Who would you play down the right??? Please dont say Sylla!?!
I seem to remember that Hull yesterday gave our left hand side a bit of a grilling. The first goal came from it and this pattern continued throughout the whole match, unlike the right hand side which has nicely marshalled by Maybury and Stearman.
Maybury has been inconnsistent compared to last season but I think he has become some what of a boo boys player with some sections of the crowd which to be honest I personally find hard to take. To be fair to Maybury he has played in three different positions this season alone!
I think there have been other players far more deserving in critisium this season than Maybury. Namely Sylla and Williams whos efforts can genuinely be questioned.
In relation to not getting results I think you will quiet clearly find that we did get the necessary results yesterday. Namely 3 points.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 21 | 50 |
2 | Arsenal | 22 | 44 |
3 | Nottm F | 21 | 41 |
4 | Newcastle | 22 | 38 |
5 | Chelsea | 21 | 37 |
6 | Bournemouth | 22 | 37 |
7 | Aston Villa | 22 | 36 |
8 | Manchester C | 21 | 35 |
9 | Fulham | 22 | 33 |
10 | Brighton | 21 | 31 |
11 | Brentford | 22 | 28 |
12 | Palace | 22 | 27 |
13 | Manchester U | 21 | 26 |
14 | West Ham | 22 | 26 |
15 | Tottenham | 21 | 24 |
16 | Everton | 20 | 17 |
17 | Wolves | 21 | 16 |
18 | Ipswich | 21 | 16 |
19 | Leicester | 22 | 14 |
20 | Southampton | 21 | 6 |