fitz
Well-Known Member
Are you saying Steve, um, Clardirge was the big man?
Would explain the socks
Are you saying Steve, um, Clardirge was the big man?
Well, a little. I'd feel better if I wasn't asked questions that I'd already answered because folk can't be bothered to read posts properly but hey ho.
Why would someone be a mug to want to manage us? I’m genuinely interested.This subject has become repetitive and boring and given that we have the rare luxury for Leicester of playing a run of more or less meaningless games - bar the Chelsea fixture which we will probably unluckily lose - we can forget about it until the summer. Puel has a record of promoting turgid football and his body language doesn't indicate he is altogether happy and the players are similarly tetchy but he isn't going anywhere soon.
If he gets the players to raise their games and stops f---ing things up with bizarre selections - all well and good, in fact, fantastic but I wouldn't rely on that happening. The real problem will be for the owners to identify another well paid mug to pick up this poisoned chalice - in the summer.
Redditch?What would make us unattractive to a potential suitor?
Take your blinkers off and have a look at Claude's record away from Southampton!This subject has become repetitive and boring and given that we have the rare luxury for Leicester of playing a run of more or less meaningless games - bar the Chelsea fixture which we will probably unluckily lose - we can forget about it until the summer. Puel has a record of promoting turgid football and his body language doesn't indicate he is altogether happy and the players are similarly tetchy but he isn't going anywhere soon.
If he gets the players to raise their games and stops f---ing things up with bizarre selections - all well and good, in fact, fantastic but I wouldn't rely on that happening. The real problem will be for the owners to identify another well paid mug to pick up this poisoned chalice - in the summer.
This subject has become repetitive and boring and given that we have the rare luxury for Leicester of playing a run of more or less meaningless games - bar the Chelsea fixture which we will probably unluckily lose - we can forget about it until the summer. Puel has a record of promoting turgid football and his body language doesn't indicate he is altogether happy and the players are similarly tetchy but he isn't going anywhere soon.
If he gets the players to raise their games and stops f---ing things up with bizarre selections - all well and good, in fact, fantastic but I wouldn't rely on that happening. The real problem will be for the owners to identify another well paid mug to pick up this poisoned chalice - in the summer.
Why would someone be a mug to want to manage us? I’m genuinely interested.
How many more attractive propositions than us are there in the Premier League at the moment outside of the ‘big 6?’
What would make us unattractive to a potential suitor?
Can’t disagree with any of that - particularly the bit about expectations but:
It was the correct ‘football and financial’ decision to let go CR.
It was the right decision to release CS for the same reasons as above.
To me we are a very attractive proposition to manage due to us:
1) Having fairly hands off owners.
2) Having shit loads of cash.
3) Having a very good infrastructure including the new training ground.
4) financial stability.
5) We pay well.
6) A very good squad.
7) A good heritage.
Outside of that there are of course the pressures of expectation to deal with and perhaps ours is disproportionate to our limited success but are we not more attractive than virtually every team beneath us bar perhaps Everton (very debatable) and Newcastle (even more debatable)?
Can’t disagree with any of that - particularly the bit about expectations but:
It was the correct ‘football and financial’ decision to let go CR.
It was the right decision to release CS for the same reasons as above.
To me we are a very attractive proposition to manage due to us:
1) Having fairly hands off owners.
2) Having shit loads of cash.
3) Having a very good infrastructure including the new training ground.
4) financial stability.
5) We pay well.
6) A very good squad.
7) A good heritage.
Outside of that there are of course the pressures of expectation to deal with and perhaps ours is disproportionate to our limited success but are we not more attractive than virtually every team beneath us bar perhaps Everton (very debatable) and Newcastle (even more debatable)?
Not as convinced as all that that we have ' a very good squad'. We have wasted a hell of a lot of money. If signings has turned out better then we would be in a stronger position. Take away Mahrez and we will be run of the mill. Still you are right that we have a strong infrastructure.
I didn't ask you a question,I made a statement!
Can l ask,do you feel he should have come straight back into the Team after his injury?
But at least you have Saturday’s game to look forward to.Erm..... let's agree to disagree.
In terms of my week - the happiness of that may depend on whether my wife makes me watch Eastenders followed by some Bake Off bollocks tonight, whether I am still alive after my first squash match in 4 years tomorrow, a trip to visit the in-laws on Thursday and my wife's credit card statement due on Friday..... I've a feeling it won't be a good week.
Oh for f..... kick a man when he's down.But at least you have Saturday’s game to look forward to.
Erm..... let's agree to disagree.
In terms of my week - the happiness of that may depend on whether my wife makes me watch Eastenders followed by some Bake Off bollocks tonight, whether I am still alive after my first squash match in 4 years tomorrow, a trip to visit the in-laws on Thursday and my wife's credit card statement due on Friday..... I've a feeling it won't be a good week.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 11 | 28 |
2 | Manchester C | 11 | 23 |
3 | Chelsea | 11 | 19 |
4 | Arsenal | 11 | 19 |
5 | Nottm F | 11 | 19 |
6 | Brighton | 11 | 19 |
7 | Fulham | 11 | 18 |
8 | Newcastle | 11 | 18 |
9 | Aston Villa | 11 | 18 |
10 | Tottenham | 11 | 16 |
11 | Brentford | 11 | 16 |
12 | Bournemouth | 11 | 15 |
13 | Manchester U | 11 | 15 |
14 | West Ham | 11 | 12 |
15 | Leicester | 11 | 10 |
16 | Everton | 11 | 10 |
17 | Ipswich | 11 | 8 |
18 | Palace | 11 | 7 |
19 | Wolves | 11 | 6 |
20 | Southampton | 11 | 4 |