I believe he can only be fairly judged having now got in his own players.Let’s see what happens if we slump to defeat next week. And then he will have the pressure of returning to his old club.
People going to be as patient if we’ve got no points after four games? Which would be something like 11 defeats from the last 15 or thereabouts?
And therein lies the problem. For Puel he has to view the Wolves game as must win. Is that fair? Probably not, but he is still odds on to be the first manager sacked I think.
Hopefully he gets at least 4 points from the next two and it all dies down a bit.
Clearly someone, somewhere has an agenda to destabilise our club.
My own view is that we should rally round and give Monsieur Puel the support and respect he deserves until such time as it is evident he is not capable of producing a successful team. That time is not now.
I have an infinite list of managers I’d rather see here ahead of Rodgers.
I wouldn’t worry about comparisons and stats. If that were to happen he’d be gone, regardless of the rest of your post (interesting as it is, though).Were we to lose our next three games, Puel would have the exact same return that Ranieri had in 16/17 when he got sacked.
When he has had a chance to use the signings he made - that would at least be a sensible start. Allowing him to buy a new defence a winger and a new no.10 and then not giving him chance to use them properly would be the most mental idea since someone said 'Chris Evans, he'd be a cracking Top Gear host'.When is that time Volpone?
There’s some right mentalists on here.
Are some seriously suggesting that our owners would allow a manager to spend the thick end of £100 million and then sack him after four games, seriously?
Didn’t anyone see the VAST improvement in performance on Friday v last season.
Puel said all along by he would need to rebuild to play his style of play, this is what he has done, now let’s just try and enjoy it for a bit, can we?
Didn’t we do just that with Shakespeare?A Premier League club is not going to take a chance on a man that has never been a manager before, it very rarely happens.
He was caretaker first, they aren’t going to hire someone brand new to the club that’s never managedDidn’t we do just that with Shakespeare?
Pretty, losing football against a very good side that will win far more games than they will lose, particularly at home.Puel's future will be determined only by results. Pretty, losing, football is meaningless. You've also set an incredibly low bar in your decision to compare the start of this season with the end of the last one. Remind me again who the manager was that systematically destroyed any semblance of decent football as last season went on.
Semantics, I would argue.He was caretaker first, they aren’t going to hire someone brand new to the club that’s never managed
Hardly, he was also a reluctant appointment when they couldn’t get WagnerSemantics, I would argue.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 11 | 28 |
2 | Manchester C | 11 | 23 |
3 | Chelsea | 11 | 19 |
4 | Arsenal | 11 | 19 |
5 | Nottm F | 11 | 19 |
6 | Brighton | 11 | 19 |
7 | Fulham | 11 | 18 |
8 | Newcastle | 11 | 18 |
9 | Aston Villa | 11 | 18 |
10 | Tottenham | 11 | 16 |
11 | Brentford | 11 | 16 |
12 | Bournemouth | 11 | 15 |
13 | Manchester U | 11 | 15 |
14 | West Ham | 11 | 12 |
15 | Leicester | 11 | 10 |
16 | Everton | 11 | 10 |
17 | Ipswich | 11 | 8 |
18 | Palace | 11 | 7 |
19 | Wolves | 11 | 6 |
20 | Southampton | 11 | 4 |