Bit early to judge. Last night may have been down to spirits lifted with Claudio getting the sack but it could be they will try for Shakey. Unless we can get someone decent he could be the answer until the summer.
Shakespeare has the distinct advantage of seeing the players day-in day-out under both NP and Ranieri. If there's anyone to identify what caused the change in player's attitudes, confidence and motivation, and more importantly redress it, then it's him. My inclination would be to stick with him until the summer.
That said, he did say his remit was one match so maybe that means there's already someone in the wings.
Last night reminded me of when Allan Evans took charge for a game against Arsenal after Little's departure. We won that night too.
The difference was that after the game, Shakespeare spoke up for his players and made it clear that he wanted the job. Evans acted like a snake that couldn't wait to get away.
I've been critical of Shakespeare's coaching skills in the past but last night I was mightily relieved that he was there.
Unless performances nose-dive, we'd be mad to mess with the current set up. The much heralded McGhee came in after Evans followed Little out the door and we went down. If we bring in someone new, it's more of a gamble than doing nothing.
It seems that the players are with Mr Shakespeare. The way Vardey referred to him as 'Shakes' makes me think that there is a healthy understanding between him and the players. Of course, I may be totally wrong.
Mr Shakespeare is like Mr Pearson was, been there a long time and knows whats' what.
Apparently they were all with CR. Don't you think that "shakes" makes them sound like peers? Is that the best relationship in a manager - player setup? Could it make it difficult when things are not going as swimmingly as after last night's game? Those are serious questions, I'm open-minded to the answers.
I've just voted the wrong sodding way on a Mercury poll. I thought the question was 'do you want NP back?' It wasn't. Sorry Shakey, I meant to vote for you.
It was an interesting interview.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 11 | 28 |
2 | Manchester C | 11 | 23 |
3 | Chelsea | 11 | 19 |
4 | Arsenal | 11 | 19 |
5 | Nottm F | 11 | 19 |
6 | Brighton | 11 | 19 |
7 | Fulham | 11 | 18 |
8 | Newcastle | 11 | 18 |
9 | Aston Villa | 11 | 18 |
10 | Tottenham | 11 | 16 |
11 | Brentford | 11 | 16 |
12 | Bournemouth | 11 | 15 |
13 | Manchester U | 11 | 15 |
14 | West Ham | 11 | 12 |
15 | Leicester | 11 | 10 |
16 | Everton | 11 | 10 |
17 | Ipswich | 11 | 8 |
18 | Palace | 11 | 7 |
19 | Wolves | 11 | 6 |
20 | Southampton | 11 | 4 |