Agreement Reached For United Duo
Posted on: Tue 15 May 2012
Leicester City have today (Tuesday) reached an agreement with Manchester United for the transfer of Ritchie De Laet and Matty James.
Defender Ritchie, 23, and midfielder Matty, 20, will join the Foxes for an undisclosed fee, signing until June 2015.
Leicester City manager Nigel Pearson said: "Ritchie and Matthew are both players we have been monitoring for some time and we are very pleased to be able to bring them both to the Club.
"Both are hungry, young players with winning mentalities, experience of Championship football and a desire to be successful. They will add considerable quality to the squad."
Belgium-born De Laet, a versatile defender and a full international, arrives at King Power Stadium following a recent loan spell with Premier League Norwich City. He made six appearances for the United first team, including three in the Premier League, after joining from Stoke City in January 2009, having started his career with Royal Antwerp.
While at Old Trafford, he also enjoyed loan spells with Sheffield United, Preston North End and Portsmouth and won two senior Belgium caps during his time with the Red Devils.
Bacup-born James, an England Under-20 international, proved equally adaptable during his time as a young professional, operating in defence as well as thriving in his more customary midfield position.
After graduating from the United academy, he signed professional terms in July 2009 and was a central figure for the reserves before two successful loan spells with Preston North End, where he made 32 appearances and scored three goals.
Happy with both of these from the little I know of them. Both been on the books at United for some time, so can't be too shabby!
Am I right in thinking De Laet is primarily a right back?
Really? Without knowing how much was paid, how can you be sure? And if they're any good, why are Man U off-loading them?Pleased with these signings, signs that Nigel is trying to build a team not just throwing money at it like Sven did. Both have a lot of potential and hopefully both will play a big part next season.
I think people are pleased that we are going for young, hungry players with a point to prove, rather than the seasoned pro's who have already earnt their corn. Whether they will turn out to be any good, nobody knows.Really? Without knowing how much was paid, how can you be sure? And if they're any good, why are Man U off-loading them?
Only time will tell if these are shrewd signings.
signs that Nigel is trying to build a team not just throwing money at it like Sven did.
Really? Without knowing how much was paid, how can you be sure? Only time will tell if these are shrewd signings.
I'll take ability over pashun any day.I think people are pleased that we are going for young, hungry players with a point to prove, rather than the seasoned pro's who have already earnt their corn. Whether they will turn out to be any good, nobody knows.
I'll take ability over pashun any day.
Luke Chadwick come on for MK Dons tonight. Just saying like.
I'll take ability over pashun any day.
Luke Chadwick come on for MK Dons tonight. Just saying like.
IMO we've gone for ability in the past and quite often the lazy feckers can't be arsed. Look no further than Norwich for some pashun!I'll take ability over pashun any day.
Luke Chadwick come on for MK Dons tonight. Just saying like.
IMO we've gone for ability in the past and quite often the lazy feckers can't be arsed. Look no further than Norwich for some pashun!
No, the Dons still lost.Have I missed something ?
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 11 | 28 |
2 | Manchester C | 11 | 23 |
3 | Chelsea | 11 | 19 |
4 | Arsenal | 11 | 19 |
5 | Nottm F | 11 | 19 |
6 | Brighton | 11 | 19 |
7 | Fulham | 11 | 18 |
8 | Newcastle | 11 | 18 |
9 | Aston Villa | 11 | 18 |
10 | Tottenham | 11 | 16 |
11 | Brentford | 11 | 16 |
12 | Bournemouth | 11 | 15 |
13 | Manchester U | 11 | 15 |
14 | West Ham | 11 | 12 |
15 | Leicester | 11 | 10 |
16 | Everton | 11 | 10 |
17 | Ipswich | 11 | 8 |
18 | Palace | 11 | 7 |
19 | Wolves | 11 | 6 |
20 | Southampton | 11 | 4 |