Rodgers future (post Forest away match)

What's the best option?

  • Sack Rodgers immediately

    Votes: 46 78.0%
  • Give Rodgers three more games and then reassess

    Votes: 1 1.7%
  • Give Rodgers until the end of the season and then reassess

    Votes: 4 6.8%
  • Lincolnshire

    Votes: 2 3.4%
  • Cumberland

    Votes: 6 10.2%

  • Total voters
    59
  • Poll closed .
Log in to stop seeing adverts

What an offal thread this has turned out to be - truly the wurst
 
Well, they say you reap what you sow.
 
Nobodys come. Nobodys gone.
Apart from Been.
 
I am not expecting people to agree with me here but I am just not convinced sacking Rodgers will work out well in the long term. Just the club is not performing at the level we think it should, that does not mean a manager we can attract to replace Rodgers will be better. Look at Burnley sacking Dyche and Chelsea sacking Tuchel. The replacements in both cases did not succeed in what they were appointed to do.

I believe Rodgers deserves the breathing space to steer us out of this bad patch because of what he has achieved:
  • Our first ever FA Cup win.
  • A Community Shield for only the second time in our history.
  • Our fourth highest top-flight finish of all time, twice in a row.
I know you could say "but he inherited on a good, established top-flight team" but so did Peter Taylor in 2000 and look how quickly he managed too **** it up with the likes of Junior Lewis and Lee Marshall.

I am not saying Rodgers is perfect and amazing. For example, I think too many of his signings have been flops and that is an issue. The best players in the Rodgers era are mainly thanks to a man named Claude Puel. Objectively, however, he is one of the best managers in Leicester City history because if you compare him to, say, Bloomfield and O'Neill, they never managed fifth place twice in a row, a European quarter-final or an FA Cup win.

We have to bear in mind, this is Leicester City. Before 2016, all we'd ever won was three league cups and the Community Shield in 1972.
 
I am not expecting people to agree with me here but I am just not convinced sacking Rodgers will work out well in the long term. Just the club is not performing at the level we think it should, that does not mean a manager we can attract to replace Rodgers will be better. Look at Burnley sacking Dyche and Chelsea sacking Tuchel. The replacements in both cases did not succeed in what they were appointed to do.

I believe Rodgers deserves the breathing space to steer us out of this bad patch because of what he has achieved:
  • Our first ever FA Cup win.
  • A Community Shield for only the second time in our history.
  • Our fourth highest top-flight finish of all time, twice in a row.
I know you could say "but he inherited on a good, established top-flight team" but so did Peter Taylor in 2000 and look how quickly he managed too **** it up with the likes of Junior Lewis and Lee Marshall.

I am not saying Rodgers is perfect and amazing. For example, I think too many of his signings have been flops and that is an issue. The best players in the Rodgers era are mainly thanks to a man named Claude Puel. Objectively, however, he is one of the best managers in Leicester City history because if you compare him to, say, Bloomfield and O'Neill, they never managed fifth place twice in a row, a European quarter-final or an FA Cup win.

We have to bear in mind, this is Leicester City. Before 2016, all we'd ever won was three league cups and the Community Shield in 1972.
My issues with Rodgers are not his achievements with us, which are reasonably impressive.

My issue personally is the total lack of interest he has in the club and the disrespect he shows to fans by blaming them and not acknowledging his clear, consistent failures even slightly.
Add to this that our injury list cannot possibly be a coincidence and the backwards progressive of many of our players and relationships with the staff and I think we need a change.
Plus the fact that he is reportedly on the 3rd highest manager salary in the league and not performing to a standard that reflects that.

We cannot afford to totally overhaul the squad, so there is only one option in my opinion.
 
My issues with Rodgers are not his achievements with us, which are reasonably impressive.

My issue personally is the total lack of interest he has in the club and the disrespect he shows to fans by blaming them and not acknowledging his clear, consistent failures even slightly.
Add to this that our injury list cannot possibly be a coincidence and the backwards progressive of many of our players and relationships with the staff and I think we need a change.
Plus the fact that he is reportedly on the 3rd highest manager salary in the league and not performing to a standard that reflects that.

We cannot afford to totally overhaul the squad, so there is only one option in my opinion.

Those are all valid points. Are you saying there is something in Rodgers' management style that causes all these injuries? I'm not disagreeing necessarily but could you elaborate on that?

I guess you're right about the backwards progression of players. I assume you're thinking of people like Soyuncu and Perez?
 
Those are all valid points. Are you saying there is something in Rodgers' management style that causes all these injuries? I'm not disagreeing necessarily but could you elaborate on that?

I guess you're right about the backwards progression of players. I assume you're thinking of people like Soyuncu and Perez?
And Ndidi and Vardy and Thomas and Castagne and Barnes all of whom look woefully out of form.
 
Log in to stop seeing adverts

P Pld Pts
1Liverpool1128
2Manchester C  1123
3Chelsea1119
4Arsenal1119
5Nottm F1119
6Brighton1119
7Fulham1118
8Newcastle1118
9Aston Villa1118
10Tottenham 1116
11Brentford1116
12Bournemouth1115
13Manchester U1115
14West Ham1112
15Leicester1110
16Everton1110
17Ipswich118
18Palace117
19Wolves116
20Southampton114

Latest posts

Back
Top