Saganowski to sign?
- Thread starter RN Fox
- Start date
- Status
Babylon
Active Member
No... if he turns you down then you are also fecked!!! You do not control him, it's his decision. All it does is stops the team currently selling him from turning round and saying they don't want to sell anymore.
Durham Fox
El Dude Brother.
saints_fan
New Member
The thing that's worrying me is a certain Mandaric.....
He would take so much pleasure in taking this deal from us, and i can imagine him trying everything he can to do so....
He would take so much pleasure in taking this deal from us, and i can imagine him trying everything he can to do so....
Durham Fox
El Dude Brother.
Tamworth Fox
Active Member
M17TT C
Well-Known Member
Don't tell me that Milan's Mother is trying to score with Saganowski, too much of a distraction for him?
TornadoShaunUK
Well-Known Member
I completely forgot about the Portsmouth-Southampton links there 
I see now anyway, they were given first refusal and they've taken that so Troyes have lived up to this clause but it says nothing about if Saganowski rejected playing for Southampton and decided he wanted to go elsewhere.. Southampton still had first refusal in this instance, but still couldn't complete the coupe because said player was offered a better deal at another club?
All above board if I've got the right end of the stick
I see now anyway, they were given first refusal and they've taken that so Troyes have lived up to this clause but it says nothing about if Saganowski rejected playing for Southampton and decided he wanted to go elsewhere.. Southampton still had first refusal in this instance, but still couldn't complete the coupe because said player was offered a better deal at another club?
All above board if I've got the right end of the stick
Why would he choose us rather than Southampton?
They finished 6th, we finished 19th, so he can hardly say it's about ambition. Can't really use the 'size of club' argument, their stadium and attendance are very similar to ours.
The only thing that could do it would be wages. And I find it difficult to believe we can afford to pay more than them. With the money they've had from Bale, Walcott and Crouch in recent years surely their financial position isn't that bad?
They finished 6th, we finished 19th, so he can hardly say it's about ambition. Can't really use the 'size of club' argument, their stadium and attendance are very similar to ours.
The only thing that could do it would be wages. And I find it difficult to believe we can afford to pay more than them. With the money they've had from Bale, Walcott and Crouch in recent years surely their financial position isn't that bad?
Nothing against Saints, but i'd really really like to see us nab this deal from under their noses... Saganowski could be an excellent signing for us (pretty much sorts our strike force IMHO with the little bit of class that we're currently lacking)... but i cant think of where Saints will bring in other players considering their current losses (assuming that the yanks dont come in for the club very soon).
Micky
Well-Known Member
I don't know why but i'm really not excited if this goes through. Yes he's scored goals and looked useful but I'd sooner us go for a younger striker, who will progress and be ready for the premier in a couple of seasons. Buy saganowski and he'll probably get 20 goals but he'll be deadwood if we reach the premier. am i missing something??? and don't say my brain please!
Southampton are in pretty poor state financially, despite the money for Crouch, Walcott and Bale... they gambled on promotion this season spending £7mil last summer, their parachute payments cut out this summer and their currently losing £1mil a week (at least that is what is being reported), unless the prospective American take over materialises they don’t have much in the way of resources to bring to bear this summer and this season coming… even compared to us, we can offer bigger wages and bigger transfer fees when compared to saints... (nice to be able to say that for once
).
No way are they losing that much. Where is that figure being reported?
Matt_B
Well-Known Member
Southampton are in pretty poor state financially, despite the money for Crouch, Walcott and Bale... they gambled on promotion this season spending £7mil last summer, their parachute payments cut out this summer and their currently losing £1mil a week (at least that is what is being reported), unless the prospective American take over materialises they don’t have much in the way of resources to bring to bear this summer and this season coming… even compared to us, we can offer bigger wages and bigger transfer fees when compared to saints... (nice to be able to say that for once
I hear 500K a month, which seems equally unlikely
Babylon
Active Member
A) He's only about 28
B) Name a striker we can get for under a mil that will progress and be ready for the prem in 2 years.
Last edited:
SilverFox
Well-Known Member
You're not wrong!
Micky
Well-Known Member
A) 28....I'd prefer a striker who was 24-25-26...Just being picky!
B) Big Izale, Billy Sharp.
I know what i'm saying seems odd but I just don't get a great feeling over this one. I hope it all comes off of course.
- Status
Championship
| P | Pld | Pts | |
| 1 | Bournemouth | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | Arsenal | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | Aston Villa | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | Brentford | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | Brighton | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | Chelsea | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | Palace | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | Everton | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | Fulham | 0 | 0 |
| 10 | Ipswich | 0 | 0 |
| 11 | Leicester | 0 | 0 |
| 12 | Liverpool | 0 | 0 |
| 13 | Manchester C | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | Manchester U | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | Newcastle | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | Nottm F | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | Southampton | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | Tottenham | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | West Ham | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | Wolves | 0 | 0 |
