No, but he must have learned a lot in recent weeks/months on how to get the best out of players.If Rob Kelly was given money to spend,do you feel he is capable of making the correct signings.If you were the one giving him the money,would you feel confident...........Looking at his past signings.......... does
he fill you with confidence.
If Rob Kelly was given money to spend,do you feel he is capable of making the correct signings.If you were the one giving him the money,would you feel confident...........Looking at his past signings.......... does
he fill you with confidence.
I think sometimes you lot on this forum build a consensus that flies in the face of the facts and just gets accepted because its been said so many times. Kenton and McAuley are both decent players and signed for free, Low and Johnson didnt cost anything and were almost certainly signed because we needed cover in those positions and they were the best of a bad bunch of options. So since hes not actually wasted any money on anyone give him the benefit of the doubt I say.
Low and Johnson are shite, both of them without any room for debate. You post holds no weight, I could have gone in to provide cover and I'm a short arsed, overweight unfit person. So are are saying Rob Kelly doesn't deserve criticism for signing these two, in fact, if I understand correctly, you are saying he deserves praise for signing them.I think sometimes you lot on this forum build a consensus that flies in the face of the facts and just gets accepted because its been said so many times. Kenton and McAuley are both decent players and signed for free, Low and Johnson didnt cost anything and were almost certainly signed because we needed cover in those positions and they were the best of a bad bunch of options. So since hes not actually wasted any money on anyone give him the benefit of the doubt I say.
Impossible question to answer because he has never had any money to spend so can't really be judged on his past signings. I suspect he knows who he would really like to bring in and imo deseves a chance if and when some money comes in to the club
Impossible question to answer because he has never had any money to spend so can't really be judged on his past signings. I suspect he knows who he would really like to bring in and imo deseves a chance if and when some money comes in to the club
Joey Gug'J will be back in a flash if RK gets a chance. Mark my words.
I hope so, how we need him!
Fecking hell, if we can't muster enough money for Joey G, then I'd say feck the takeover lets stay as we are. If thats all we can get with MM's millions I couldn't give a shit about themWe're missing the guy like we miss Ooh Aah Mustafa, but, realistically, would he really come back, and could we muster enough money for the guy?
Fecking hell, if we can't muster enough money for Joey G, then I'd say feck the takeover lets stay as we are. If thats all we can get with MM's millions I couldn't give a shit about them
I can't remember him signing anyone that's done well so far...
McAuley? Kenton?
Cant imagine we would sign premiership players unless they were flops or old has beens coming for the £££
Didnt MM buy alot of foreign players?
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Leicester | 46 | 97 |
2 | Ipswich | 46 | 96 |
3 | Leeds Utd | 46 | 90 |
4 | Southampton | 46 | 87 |
5 | West Brom | 46 | 75 |
6 | Norwich City | 46 | 73 |
7 | Hull City | 46 | 70 |
8 | Middlesbro | 46 | 69 |
9 | Coventry City | 46 | 64 |
10 | Preston | 46 | 63 |
11 | Bristol City | 46 | 62 |
12 | Cardiff City | 46 | 62 |
13 | Millwall | 46 | 59 |
14 | Swansea City | 46 | 57 |
15 | Watford | 46 | 56 |
16 | Sunderland | 46 | 56 |
17 | Stoke City | 46 | 56 |
18 | QPR | 46 | 56 |
19 | Blackburn | 46 | 53 |
20 | Sheffield W | 46 | 53 |
21 | Plymouth | 46 | 51 |
22 | Birmingham | 46 | 50 |
23 | Huddersfield | 46 | 45 |
24 | Rotherham Utd | 46 | 27 |