although we have a lot of cash we still only have so much available, so if they think we can cope without Maguire and already had the replacement signed up that's good enough then they may choose to do so in order to finance other moves, same with NDidi, unless we get bought by a State like Man City that's the way things will always be.Talk of us selling Ndidi as a positive move. Holy Jebus. Can we just add it to the talk of us selling Maguire to improve our defence, all the guff about Maddison being nothing but an over-hyped showpony, BN's conspiracy theories, anything written in the Mercury, all of Puel's press conferences and the ****ing drivel about Vardy being the reason we were shit for so long, put it all in a new thread and then set fire to the bastard?
With the money we’re getting for Ndidi and Maguire, we can take them bothSo, if Man. City offered Mahrez back for 40 million would you go for it or spend the money on Tielemans?
So, if Man. City offered Mahrez back for 40 million would you go for it or spend the money on Tielemans?
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 11 | 28 |
2 | Manchester C | 11 | 23 |
3 | Chelsea | 11 | 19 |
4 | Arsenal | 11 | 19 |
5 | Nottm F | 11 | 19 |
6 | Brighton | 11 | 19 |
7 | Fulham | 11 | 18 |
8 | Newcastle | 11 | 18 |
9 | Aston Villa | 11 | 18 |
10 | Tottenham | 11 | 16 |
11 | Brentford | 11 | 16 |
12 | Bournemouth | 11 | 15 |
13 | Manchester U | 11 | 15 |
14 | West Ham | 11 | 12 |
15 | Leicester | 11 | 10 |
16 | Everton | 11 | 10 |
17 | Ipswich | 11 | 8 |
18 | Palace | 11 | 7 |
19 | Wolves | 11 | 6 |
20 | Southampton | 11 | 4 |