The Bulgarians come Hungarians
- Thread starter fludie
- Start date
- Status
Melton Fox
Dancing Queen
newtonfox
Active Member
Re: The Bulgarians
I made a mistake i got mixed up and thought they came from Bulgaria, why so much abuse for a little mistake
I made a mistake i got mixed up and thought they came from Bulgaria, why so much abuse for a little mistake
Last edited:
Uncle Connolly
Active Member
2 + 2 = 5
four king power
Active Member
Re: The Bulgarians
Because as you well know they were brought in as cover until the end of the season.
The first choice wingers did not materialise in the transfer window so they were played as we had bugger all choice.
they have shown IH that they are not ready for first team football yet and therefore not in the squad.
We now have Etuhu and IH seems keen on playing Hume on the wing so dont expect to see them anytime soon.
I made a mistake i thought that they came from Bulgaria, why so much abuse for a little mistake
Because as you well know they were brought in as cover until the end of the season.
The first choice wingers did not materialise in the transfer window so they were played as we had bugger all choice.
they have shown IH that they are not ready for first team football yet and therefore not in the squad.
We now have Etuhu and IH seems keen on playing Hume on the wing so dont expect to see them anytime soon.
newtonfox
Active Member
Re: The Bulgarians
But... Hume is not a winger and he does play so much better up front, i would prefer Lazcto on the wing rather than Hume or Mattock, Etuhu then maybe on the other wing as he seemed to do well on Saturday.
But... Hume is not a winger and he does play so much better up front, i would prefer Lazcto on the wing rather than Hume or Mattock, Etuhu then maybe on the other wing as he seemed to do well on Saturday.
The Old Fox
Well-Known Member
four king power
Active Member
homer
Well-Known Member
For anyone interested, the dominant ethnic and cultural poulation of Hungary are the Magyar
Hence
http://www.talkingballs.co.uk/showthread.php?t=23361
Hence
http://www.talkingballs.co.uk/showthread.php?t=23361
Last edited:
Macky
Gruntled Member
homer
Well-Known Member
There is, but it says I'm not allowed in as I have no friends
newtonfox
Active Member
look to the left ,the one marked NO mates :icon_bigg:icon_wink
E
EnergeticFox
Guest
Where have these two disappeared off to, when they first arrived they played straight away for a few games and now they have not been in the squad at all.
Seems like more wasted money
They have both come in on loan, with view to a permanent deal, so only wages wasted, which is clever as we can f**k them off at end of season!
- Status
Championship
| P | Pld | Pts | |
| 1 | Leicester | 46 | 97 |
| 2 | Ipswich | 46 | 96 |
| 3 | Leeds Utd | 46 | 90 |
| 4 | Southampton | 46 | 87 |
| 5 | West Brom | 46 | 75 |
| 6 | Norwich City | 46 | 73 |
| 7 | Hull City | 46 | 70 |
| 8 | Middlesbro | 46 | 69 |
| 9 | Coventry City | 46 | 64 |
| 10 | Preston | 46 | 63 |
| 11 | Bristol City | 46 | 62 |
| 12 | Cardiff City | 46 | 62 |
| 13 | Millwall | 46 | 59 |
| 14 | Swansea City | 46 | 57 |
| 15 | Watford | 46 | 56 |
| 16 | Sunderland | 46 | 56 |
| 17 | Stoke City | 46 | 56 |
| 18 | QPR | 46 | 56 |
| 19 | Blackburn | 46 | 53 |
| 20 | Sheffield W | 46 | 53 |
| 21 | Plymouth | 46 | 51 |
| 22 | Birmingham | 46 | 50 |
| 23 | Huddersfield | 46 | 45 |
| 24 | Rotherham Utd | 46 | 27 |
