Don't buy it then. It's not rocket science.
Millions of people read it though, and believe what they read, even though it's full of made up bollocks.
Some newspapers make up harmless stuff (London bus found on the moon, Freddie Starr ate my hamster etc), the Mail do it in a way that stirs up hatred and intolerance.
I read the Mail on Sunday, I agree with some of it, disagree with other bits, don't bother reading large chunks of it because I'm not interested. It's no different to any other paper in that respect.
Just because some people don't agree with it's viewpoint doesn't mean
a) It's all lies.
or
b) It shouldn't be allowed.
Are you defending the stuff FryattFox linked to?
I would have thought that would make every Daily Mail reader think twice about believing anything they read in that paper.
They wrote 2 stories to cover whichever way the verdict went and by accident posted the wrong one, a bit embarrassing for them possibly, but hardly crime of the century. If it had been any other paper nobody would have batted an eyelid.
Just because some people don't agree with it's viewpoint doesn't mean
a) It's all lies.
or
b) It shouldn't be allowed.
They wrote 2 stories to cover whichever way the verdict went and by accident posted the wrong one, a bit embarrassing for them possibly, but hardly crime of the century. If it had been any other paper nobody would have batted an eyelid.
I find this obsession with the Mail a bit boring actually.
Nobody has suggested that the Mail is all lies because they don't agree with its viewpoint, it's because it is a vile rag, full of rancid lies.
I read it yesterday on another forum. I thought it was a bit pathetic then.You clearly did not read what I posted then.
The Major said:I'm so sorry. I admit I was wrong about the Daily Mail.
Seeing as you don't believe in censorship, you should support their right to say whatever they want.
Looking at that site the guy seems obsessed with the Mail, with a couple of bits about about the Express chucked in for balance. Honestly, get a life.
I'm glad we agree.When did I say any different?
I don't give a f*ck what obsessions he has. Assuming that what he posted in this instance is genuine, and I haven't seen any comments or suggestions that it isn't, it's a disgusting abuse of power and journalistic trust. To post quotes from the prosecution that were completely made up is awful, awful reporting, and God only knows what their tabloid news is like if a main headline story can be this embellished.
"Justice has been done" and "on a human factor it was sad two young people would be spending years in jail". awful, awful really?
Do you think the Mail is the only paper that does that?
Anyway I really don't care. Read whatever paper you like and I'll save my hatred for something important.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 11 | 28 |
2 | Manchester C | 11 | 23 |
3 | Chelsea | 11 | 19 |
4 | Arsenal | 11 | 19 |
5 | Nottm F | 11 | 19 |
6 | Brighton | 11 | 19 |
7 | Fulham | 11 | 18 |
8 | Newcastle | 11 | 18 |
9 | Aston Villa | 11 | 18 |
10 | Tottenham | 11 | 16 |
11 | Brentford | 11 | 16 |
12 | Bournemouth | 11 | 15 |
13 | Manchester U | 11 | 15 |
14 | West Ham | 11 | 12 |
15 | Leicester | 11 | 10 |
16 | Everton | 11 | 10 |
17 | Ipswich | 11 | 8 |
18 | Palace | 11 | 7 |
19 | Wolves | 11 | 6 |
20 | Southampton | 11 | 4 |