We’ll probably sell. Do Southampton have anymore duffers for us to sign?Give him an improved contract and move on. He must not be sold.
Did deep enough and there is always clay.We’ll probably sell. Do Southampton have anymore duffers for us to sign?
Because they sell shares in the club at £40m each to fund sales like they did in January.I don’t understand FFP. They are in debt. Almost every club is. I don’t understand how clubs are permitted to get into much deeper debt in a regime of ‘living within your means’. If state sponsored clubs can just spend what they like, what’s the ****ing point at all at this stage.
I might start watching AEW, at least they are honest about the outcome being fixed.
By offering Maddison a bumper new contract of courseI suspect we are getting into the territory of ‘need to sell’. Our wage to turnover ratio apparently breaches FFP so we must find a way of complying
I reckon that will be funded by sacrificing other players. Great if trueBy offering Maddison a bumper new contract of course
And yet we'll sell them anyone they wantLast week they wanted Barnes, this week it's Maddison. Yeah right.
The offer wasn't even £40m. It was a 'structured' deal adding up to £35m.
Newcastle must be treated for the despotic scum of a club they now are. Just laugh at their embarrassing amateurishness.
When did that start, then?And yet we'll sell them anyone they want
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 11 | 28 |
2 | Manchester C | 11 | 23 |
3 | Chelsea | 11 | 19 |
4 | Arsenal | 11 | 19 |
5 | Nottm F | 11 | 19 |
6 | Brighton | 11 | 19 |
7 | Fulham | 11 | 18 |
8 | Newcastle | 11 | 18 |
9 | Aston Villa | 11 | 18 |
10 | Tottenham | 11 | 16 |
11 | Brentford | 11 | 16 |
12 | Bournemouth | 11 | 15 |
13 | Manchester U | 11 | 15 |
14 | West Ham | 11 | 12 |
15 | Leicester | 11 | 10 |
16 | Everton | 11 | 10 |
17 | Ipswich | 11 | 8 |
18 | Palace | 11 | 7 |
19 | Wolves | 11 | 6 |
20 | Southampton | 11 | 4 |