FOX Franks
Well-Known Member
He must make a brilliant cappuccino, thenRvN has said that they expect Eduoard to stay. He is looking abroad for loans as they can't have any more from the PL.
He must make a brilliant cappuccino, thenRvN has said that they expect Eduoard to stay. He is looking abroad for loans as they can't have any more from the PL.
RvN has said that they expect Eduoard to stay. He is looking abroad for loans as they can't have any more from the PL.
Taking it as genuine (it probably isn’t).
This is probably a contingency in the event we sell Soumare, which I could definitely see us doing.
Literally the only possible explanation.If this is true then it’s ****ng insane - doesn’t even make the bench now. and has looked like a complete ****ing shithouse when he has got onto the pitch. Along with Bobby Shitpants, he is the most ludicrous example of the Cooper/Rudkin summer recruitment masterclass
I strongly suspect we’ve ****ed this deal up so can’t give him back
Literally the only possible explanation.
Positively Machiavellian in their dastardliness - and they'd further insist we would play him against them when we meet in a couple of weeks time.If you were Palace and wanted to ensure that we remain a basket case of a club, leave him with us so we can't replace him with somebody competent. It's smart business on their part.
Isn't there some kind of clause in a contract whereby if they act in an unprofessional manner they can be sent back? Clearly being really shit isn't classed as unprofessional. Can't we set him up somehow? Send on a holiday break to Thialand with James Pearson?Glasner was asked about this a few weeks ago and said he wasn't interested in Eduoard coming back to Palace. He was clear that he wasn't part of his plans so all they'd do is move him onto another loan.
If you were Palace and wanted to ensure that we remain a basket case of a club, leave him with us so we can't replace him with somebody competent. It's smart business on their part.
Give him a fire extinguisher as a belated Xmas present & **** him off to La Manga.Isn't there some kind of clause in a contract whereby if they act in an unprofessional manner they can be sent back? Clearly being really shit isn't classed as unprofessional. Can't we set him up somehow? Send on a holiday break to Thialand with James Pearson?
If there's actually any truth in it that's the sort of signing I want us making. Youngish, point to prove, taking a risk on an EFL player for a reasonable enough fee. & getting a proven player at the level if we go down.
We don't need to drop £50m. What happened to scouting an up and coming unknown defender?
It worked for Liverpool back in the day. Well, not the dross part.Why are we obsessed with buying Southampton's dross ffs? Do we not have a scouting network that can discover some up and coming defenders?
Edouard doesn’t have a clause in his deal to send him back. Requires all parties to find him another club - publically they won’t say that tho
Get him here espresso!
If we do then it Browned eyed girl chorus La La La La La La La La La La La Latte Lath oh Latte Lath sortedGet him here espresso!
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 18 | 45 |
2 | Arsenal | 20 | 40 |
3 | Nottm F | 19 | 37 |
4 | Chelsea | 20 | 36 |
5 | Newcastle | 20 | 35 |
6 | Manchester C | 20 | 34 |
7 | Bournemouth | 20 | 33 |
8 | Aston Villa | 20 | 32 |
9 | Fulham | 19 | 29 |
10 | Brighton | 20 | 28 |
11 | Brentford | 20 | 27 |
12 | Tottenham | 20 | 24 |
13 | West Ham | 20 | 23 |
14 | Manchester U | 19 | 22 |
15 | Palace | 20 | 21 |
16 | Everton | 19 | 17 |
17 | Wolves | 19 | 16 |
18 | Ipswich | 19 | 15 |
19 | Leicester | 20 | 14 |
20 | Southampton | 20 | 6 |