The Leicester City Points & Position Tracker.

[Macky]

1st  High 106.0                    
1st  Av   92.1   93   19/04/2014    43    3    9.0
1st  Low  81.0   85   29/03/2014    38    8    24.0
---------------------------------------------------
2nd  High 91.0   93   19/04/2014    43    3    9.0
2nd  Av   85.3   89   04/04/2014    40    6    18.0
2nd  Low  79.0   80   15/03/2014    35    11   33.0
---------------------------------------------------
3rd  High 86.0   89   04/04/2014    40    6    18.0
3rd  Av   80.6   85   29/03/2014    38    8    24.0
3rd  Low  75.0   77   11/03/2014    34    12   39.0

A bit easier on the eyes

 

[camberwell fox]

1st  High 106.0                    
1st  Av   92.1   93   19/04/2014    43    3    9.0
1st  Low  81.0   85   29/03/2014    38    8    24.0
---------------------------------------------------
2nd  High 91.0   93   19/04/2014    43    3    9.0
2nd  Av   85.3   89   04/04/2014    40    6    18.0
2nd  Low  79.0   80   15/03/2014    35    11   33.0
---------------------------------------------------
3rd  High 86.0   89   04/04/2014    40    6    18.0
3rd  Av   80.6   85   29/03/2014    38    8    24.0
3rd  Low  75.0   77   11/03/2014    34    12   39.0

A bit easier on the eyes

Just a tad. Thanks Macky.

 

[fitz]

Pffft 'math'....the lowest we can finish is first

 

[camberwell fox]

Pffft 'math'....the lowest we can finish is first

Not sure that's what it says Fitz?

 

[st albans fox]

Looks like burnley will obtain a record high points total for second place.

 

[camberwell fox]

Looks like burnley will obtain a record high points total for second place.

It certainly does.

 

[Blaarev]

It certainly does.

Unless we take it from under their noses

 

[bocadillo]

1st  High 106.0                    
1st  Av   92.1   93   19/04/2014    43    3    9.0
1st  Low  81.0   85   29/03/2014    38    8    24.0
---------------------------------------------------
2nd  High 91.0   93   19/04/2014    43    3    9.0
2nd  Av   85.3   89   04/04/2014    40    6    18.0
2nd  Low  79.0   80   15/03/2014    35    11   33.0
---------------------------------------------------
3rd  High 86.0   89   04/04/2014    40    6    18.0
3rd  Av   80.6   85   29/03/2014    38    8    24.0
3rd  Low  75.0   77   11/03/2014    34    12   39.0

I haven't taken much notice of this thread and I am not exactly sure that I understand it. Is the date in each line supposed to show the date on which City gained the number of points to match/beat that particular level? If so, I don't understand the '1st Low' line; if we reached 85 points on 29/03, presumably we must have passed the required 81 point threshold some time before then so why isn't that shown?

Or am I completely off course?

 

[camberwell fox]

I haven't taken much notice of this thread and I am not exactly sure that I understand it. Is the date in each line supposed to show the date on which City gained the number of points to match/beat that particular level? If so, I don't understand the '1st Low' line; if we reached 85 points on 29/03, presumably we must have passed the required 81 point threshold some time before then so why isn't that shown?

Or am I completely off course?

You understand correctly Boc.

With regard to the passing of points. When a milestone (points target) is met the date that it is net and the points tally are entered in that line. If we then get further points but a further points total isn't surpassed then it is entered over the top of the original total recorded.

Hope that makes done sense!!

 

[bocadillo]

You understand correctly Boc.

With regard to the passing of points. When a milestone (points target) is met the date that it is net and the points tally are entered in that line. If we then get further points but a further points total isn't surpassed then it is entered over the top of the original total recorded.

Hope that makes done sense!!

I don't understand then why the '2nd Low' and '3rd Low' lines haven't get higher entries because the respective 'Ave' targets can not have been surpassed in a single game.

Or perhaps it still doesn't make sense to me.

 

[camberwell fox]

I see what you mean.

To try and explain it better:

Take 3rd high and 2nd high as an example. The highest (target) for third is 86 and the highest (target) for 2nd is 91. 86 points were achieved at the 39 game mark but there is no other target until 91 so we then hit 89 points after match 40 but didn't reach another target (highest 2nd) until match 43 which then will continue to be updated should we get more points between now and the end of the season.

There is no way I can update 1st high as we won't hit it therefore average 1st will continue to be updated.

Geddit?

 

[bocadillo]

I see what you mean.

To try and explain it better:

Take 3rd high and 2nd high as an example. The highest (target) for third is 86 and the highest (target) for 2nd is 91. 86 points were achieved at the 39 game mark but there is no other target until 91 so we then hit 89 points after match 40 but didn't reach another target (highest 2nd) until match 43 which then will continue to be updated should we get more points between now and the end of the season.

There is no way I can update 1st high as we won't hit it therefore average 1st will continue to be updated.

Geddit?

eeerrr... I now get why I haven't taken part in the thread.

 

[FryattFox]

eeerrr... I now get why I haven't taken part in the thread.

:icon_bigg

I've got just the thread for you here...

 

[camberwell fox]

 

[Blaarev]

Nice

 

[camberwell fox]

Final Position	Status	Final Points Gained	Current Points Gained	Date Points Achieved	Games Played	Games Remaining	Available Points
1st	High	106.0
1st	Av	92.1	96.0	22-Apr	44	2	6.0
1st	Low	81.0	85.0	29-Mar	38	8	24.0
2nd	High	91.0	96.0	22-Apr	44	2	6.0
2nd	Av	85.3	89.0	04-Apr	40	6	18.0
2nd	Low	79.0	80.0	15-Mar	35	11	33.0
3rd	High	86.0	89.0	04-Apr	40	6	18.0
3rd	Av	80.6	85.0	29-Mar	38	8	24.0
3rd	Low	75.0	77.0	11-Mar	34	12	39.0

 

[camberwell fox]

nicer

 

[Blaarev]

nicer

Very much so.

 

[camberwell fox]

One tries my little scandywandypoos

 

[camberwell fox]

Will update tomorrow.