New Contract Two (or 3?) more years for Mendy
- Thread starter Jeff
- Start date
This page may contain links to companies such as eBay and Amazon. As an affiliate of these sites I may earn commission if you click the link and make a purchase
- Status
LCFC.com says it's 3 years. But the wording on there is exactly the same as the press release they sent out, which said it was 2 years. Shambles.
bocadillo
Water Gypsy
And on your birthday too. What a present!
M17TT C
Well-Known Member
Just shows how much of a mess we are in right now.
I'm surprised we haven't been relegated already!
homer
Well-Known Member
In all seriousness, how the **** could they get the length of the contract wrong?
M17TT C
Well-Known Member
If we're being that serious about it, there are a number of reason for it - human error typo is the most likely one I would say though.
Not something even worth considering getting worked up over, let alone actually get worked up by it.
Unless of course you are just desperately looking for any aspect to be negative about.
Micky
Well-Known Member
Someone with bad coordination or fat fingers.
Blaarev
Well-Known Member
Amazing!
fitz
Well-Known Member
Yep. Nothing about his time here suggests he's worth a squad place. Why 2 years when we'd sensibly let his contract wind down? If we're desperate why not a 1 year deal as he's hardly a player in great demand.
Brown Nose
Well-Known Member
Rudkin: Hi there Papy. Now then, I know we said our farewells a few weeks ago but with the market the way it is, we would now like to offer you a new one year deal.
Mendy: Three years.
Rudkin: Ha, ha. Now then Papy son, one year would be a good deal for us both. You can then see what opportunities you have next summer.
Mendy: Three years.
Rudkin: Look, I'll tell you what I'll do. For goodwill, we'll offer you a two year deal. I can't say fairer than that.
Mendy: Three years.
Rudkin: Come on now, you're not being reasonable. Three years is a big commitment for someone who has only started 31 PL games in 4 years.
Mendy: Three years.
Rudkin: You drive a hard bargain Papy. Okay then, three years it is. By the way, seeing as you're staying, can we have the leaving gift back that we gave you?
Mendy: No.
Rudkin: See you at training then.
Mendy: Three years.
Rudkin: Ha, ha. Now then Papy son, one year would be a good deal for us both. You can then see what opportunities you have next summer.
Mendy: Three years.
Rudkin: Look, I'll tell you what I'll do. For goodwill, we'll offer you a two year deal. I can't say fairer than that.
Mendy: Three years.
Rudkin: Come on now, you're not being reasonable. Three years is a big commitment for someone who has only started 31 PL games in 4 years.
Mendy: Three years.
Rudkin: You drive a hard bargain Papy. Okay then, three years it is. By the way, seeing as you're staying, can we have the leaving gift back that we gave you?
Mendy: No.
Rudkin: See you at training then.
popillius
Well-Known Member
Special stuff.
Miles Away
Well-Known Member
Better than Hamza.
popillius
Well-Known Member
So am I. Give me a contract.
Miles Away
Well-Known Member
popillius
Well-Known Member
Good choice.
popillius
Well-Known Member
Jeez I had forgot about him. So we now have Mendy, Praet, Choudhury and James.... none of whom are really good enough for us although Praet is a little better than the other three. Holy shit that is one set of midfield mediocrity.
- Status
| P | Pld | Pts | |
| 1 | Liverpool | 23 | 56 |
| 2 | Arsenal | 24 | 50 |
| 3 | Nottm F | 24 | 47 |
| 4 | Chelsea | 24 | 43 |
| 5 | Manchester C | 24 | 41 |
| 6 | Newcastle | 24 | 41 |
| 7 | Bournemouth | 24 | 40 |
| 8 | Aston Villa | 24 | 37 |
| 9 | Fulham | 24 | 36 |
| 10 | Brighton | 24 | 34 |
| 11 | Brentford | 24 | 31 |
| 12 | Palace | 24 | 30 |
| 13 | Manchester U | 24 | 29 |
| 14 | Tottenham | 24 | 27 |
| 15 | West Ham | 24 | 27 |
| 16 | Everton | 23 | 26 |
| 17 | Wolves | 24 | 19 |
| 18 | Leicester | 24 | 17 |
| 19 | Ipswich | 24 | 16 |
| 20 | Southampton | 24 | 9 |
