Valladolid

Log in to stop seeing adverts

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm sure you WOULD HAVE noticed it sooner or later;)


My gran was 97 when she died and she was still writing "of" instead of "have" until the very end. She also used to say "come by" instead of "excuse me". It didn't make her any less of a person.
 
Last edited:
After reading this, I would line our midfield up against Swansea as so:

Dyer-----Wellens----Oakley----Gradel/N'Guessan
 
We bumped into a Barnsley fan and a Northampton fan before they game, they just asked if city were playing today. The Barnsley fan was saying that Hume was on his way back and the N'hampton fan was quite complimentary about us. I just said how refeshing it was to meet some genuinly nice football fans last season that actually cared about their teams rather than just spoiling for a fight.

Just thought you'd like to know....
 
After reading this, I would line our midfield up against Swansea as so:

Dyer-----Wellens----Oakley----Gradel/N'Guessan

I wouldn't mind that at all but I reckon Nige will go for King in the middle and Oakley out wide.
 
Fryatt probably won't be match fit so Dany will more than likely be up top.

I think it might make more sense to start with Fryatt, then bring Dany on.

N'Guessan's pace means he should have more of an impact when defenders are tiring towards the end of a game.

By starting with Fryatt it also means he can play for as long as his fitness will allow, if he comes on as sub there's an element of guesswork involved in how long to give him.
 
Why no Dyer? Plus Fryatt probably won't be match fit so Dany will more than likely be up top.

Because I rate N'Guessan as better than Dyer and Gradel is best on the right wing with Oakley inside him. King on the bench with Fryatt once Phillips has signed!
 
I think it might make more sense to start with Fryatt, then bring Dany on.

N'Guessan's pace means he should have more of an impact when defenders are tiring towards the end of a game.

By starting with Fryatt it also means he can play for as long as his fitness will allow, if he comes on as sub there's an element of guesswork involved in how long to give him.

Don't get me wrong i'd love to see Fryatt start and it would certainly be the best thing for the team, i'd rather see then unfit Matty Fryatt come on for a pacy N'guessan thats already worn down the opposition defence. But I do agree about it being hard to guage Fryatt's fitness off the back of substitute perforances.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

P Pld Pts
1Manchester C  923
2Liverpool922
3Arsenal918
4Aston Villa918
5Chelsea917
6Brighton916
7Nottm F916
8Tottenham 913
9Brentford913
10Fulham912
11Bournemouth912
12Newcastle912
13West Ham911
14Manchester U911
15Leicester99
16Everton99
17Palace96
18Ipswich94
19Wolves92
20Southampton91

Latest posts

Back
Top