Valladolid

Log in to stop seeing adverts
This page may contain links to companies such as eBay and Amazon. As an affiliate of these sites I may earn commission if you click the link and make a purchase

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm sure you WOULD HAVE noticed it sooner or later;)


My gran was 97 when she died and she was still writing "of" instead of "have" until the very end. She also used to say "come by" instead of "excuse me". It didn't make her any less of a person.
 
Last edited:
After reading this, I would line our midfield up against Swansea as so:

Dyer-----Wellens----Oakley----Gradel/N'Guessan
 
We bumped into a Barnsley fan and a Northampton fan before they game, they just asked if city were playing today. The Barnsley fan was saying that Hume was on his way back and the N'hampton fan was quite complimentary about us. I just said how refeshing it was to meet some genuinly nice football fans last season that actually cared about their teams rather than just spoiling for a fight.

Just thought you'd like to know....
 
After reading this, I would line our midfield up against Swansea as so:

Dyer-----Wellens----Oakley----Gradel/N'Guessan

I wouldn't mind that at all but I reckon Nige will go for King in the middle and Oakley out wide.
 
Fryatt probably won't be match fit so Dany will more than likely be up top.

I think it might make more sense to start with Fryatt, then bring Dany on.

N'Guessan's pace means he should have more of an impact when defenders are tiring towards the end of a game.

By starting with Fryatt it also means he can play for as long as his fitness will allow, if he comes on as sub there's an element of guesswork involved in how long to give him.
 
Why no Dyer? Plus Fryatt probably won't be match fit so Dany will more than likely be up top.

Because I rate N'Guessan as better than Dyer and Gradel is best on the right wing with Oakley inside him. King on the bench with Fryatt once Phillips has signed!
 
I think it might make more sense to start with Fryatt, then bring Dany on.

N'Guessan's pace means he should have more of an impact when defenders are tiring towards the end of a game.

By starting with Fryatt it also means he can play for as long as his fitness will allow, if he comes on as sub there's an element of guesswork involved in how long to give him.

Don't get me wrong i'd love to see Fryatt start and it would certainly be the best thing for the team, i'd rather see then unfit Matty Fryatt come on for a pacy N'guessan thats already worn down the opposition defence. But I do agree about it being hard to guage Fryatt's fitness off the back of substitute perforances.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

P Pld Pts
1Liverpool2150
2Arsenal2244
3Nottm F2244
4Chelsea2240
5Manchester C  2238
6Newcastle2238
7Bournemouth2237
8Aston Villa2236
9Brighton2234
10Fulham2233
11Brentford2228
12Palace2227
13Manchester U2226
14West Ham2226
15Tottenham 2224
16Everton2120
17Wolves2216
18Ipswich2216
19Leicester2214
20Southampton226

Latest posts

Back
Top