He's not an international keeper, so why do the reports insist on calling him that?
He's not an international keeper, so why do the reports insist on calling him that?
Last played internationally 5 years ago, so currently an ex international.
Actually it was less than a year ago....http://www.bbc.com/sport/football/33044269
Last played internationally 5 years ago, so currently an ex international.
Don't ask me why that was my first response to this thread because I don't bloody well know, alright.
And, yet, other rumours suggest the opposite:From what I heard from people knowledgeable in German football, they're convinced Schmeichel is off now as "Zieler is way too good to be a back-up". Zieler will no doubt start out as number 2 but I would imagine (and hope) that he will get a fair chance to compete, especially given that there will be more games to show Ranieri why they should play
I certainly don't think Schmeichel will leave. But I don't think Zieler is signed as a clear-cut back-up. It would be a strange career move for himAnd, yet, other rumours suggest the opposite:
http://m.leicestermercury.co.uk/Lei...hmeichel-new/story-29351961-detail/story.html
Yep, I agree with you.I certainly don't think Schmeichel will leave. But I don't think Zieler is signed as a clear-cut back-up. It would be a strange career move for him
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 11 | 28 |
2 | Manchester C | 11 | 23 |
3 | Chelsea | 11 | 19 |
4 | Arsenal | 11 | 19 |
5 | Nottm F | 11 | 19 |
6 | Brighton | 11 | 19 |
7 | Fulham | 11 | 18 |
8 | Newcastle | 11 | 18 |
9 | Aston Villa | 11 | 18 |
10 | Tottenham | 11 | 16 |
11 | Brentford | 11 | 16 |
12 | Bournemouth | 11 | 15 |
13 | Manchester U | 11 | 15 |
14 | West Ham | 11 | 12 |
15 | Leicester | 11 | 10 |
16 | Everton | 11 | 10 |
17 | Ipswich | 11 | 8 |
18 | Palace | 11 | 7 |
19 | Wolves | 11 | 6 |
20 | Southampton | 11 | 4 |