Miles Away
Well-Known Member
Or is it....?
Yes.
Or is it....?
Bloody unlucky at the end though hitting the inside of the post right at the end.Yes.
Oliver Kay has written about the five substitute rule in The Athletic:
https://theathletic.co.uk/1916203/2...ule-ifab-liverpool-villa-grealish-dean-smith/
Interesting to note that the rule was proposed by Chelsea and supported by all but four clubs; Bournemouth, Sheff Utd, Villa and West Ham.
Now the proposal is to extend the rule for the entirety of next season. It will need to be voted on by the PL clubs though so I hope that enough of them have realised that it only benefits the richest clubs and vote it down. I also hope that Leicester are smart enough to switch their vote.
Good point, dickhead.If we get Champions League theres no way we will vote it down.
It gives us a much better opportunity to keep players happy and also rotate in games where we have the opportunity.
Good point, dickhead.
Yep. I'm now cheering on CAS for the rest of the season.Wolves lost. That’s top 5 pretty much confirmed now, especially considering our goal difference.
Yep. I'm now cheering on CAS for the rest of the season.
We should know within the next week or so. They said the verdict would be in the first half of July.
I don't follow the logic on this. Is it sarcasm?If we get Champions League theres no way we will vote it down.
It gives us a much better opportunity to keep players happy and also rotate in games where we have the opportunity.
Yep. I'm now cheering on CAS for the rest of the season.
CAS have tended to side with governing bodies in these type of cases apparentlyI'm not hopeful. Would be too nice a thing to happen in the year of our lord 2020.
Grealish will show Man U how much they need himI want villa relegated but **** me we need them to somehow win tonight
I'm not hopeful. Would be too nice a thing to happen in the year of our lord 2020.
I want villa relegated but **** me we need them to somehow win tonight
You’re like the Krays you ‘hard, but fair.’Maybe I'm naive but I cannot see any way Man City win this case. What they were up to was so clearly demonstrated in those emails that there is no point whatsoever in FFP if they're not severely punished.
In fact, on the evidence, I think their punishment was pretty light. If CAS find some administrative reason to overturn the ruling, it will stink.
In fact, I'm looking for the PL to react with further punishments once they are found guilty. It effectively means that they were cheating throughout 2012-2016 and should be stripped of anything they won over that period.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Leicester | 44 | 94 |
2 | Leeds Utd | 45 | 90 |
3 | Ipswich | 43 | 89 |
4 | Southampton | 45 | 84 |
5 | Norwich City | 45 | 73 |
6 | West Brom | 45 | 72 |
7 | Hull City | 44 | 69 |
8 | Middlesbro | 45 | 66 |
9 | Coventry City | 44 | 64 |
10 | Preston | 44 | 63 |
11 | Bristol City | 45 | 62 |
12 | Cardiff City | 45 | 62 |
13 | Swansea City | 45 | 57 |
14 | Watford | 45 | 56 |
15 | Sunderland | 45 | 56 |
16 | Millwall | 45 | 56 |
17 | QPR | 45 | 53 |
18 | Stoke City | 45 | 53 |
19 | Blackburn | 45 | 50 |
20 | Sheffield W | 45 | 50 |
21 | Plymouth | 45 | 48 |
22 | Birmingham | 45 | 47 |
23 | Huddersfield | 45 | 45 |
24 | Rotherham Utd | 45 | 24 |