Stoke City - Sunday 4th May 2008 - 2pm
- Thread starter Nottingham Fox
- Start date
- Status
Yorkshire Vixen
Active Member
ott imo!!
homer
Well-Known Member
I felt very intimidated by it
Nottingham Fox
Moderator
We can moan as much as we want to, but they (Stoke) have allocated us a total of 2,000 tickets. They are not obliged to offer us anymore.
Lets hope the 2,000 that have been able to get tickets really get behind the lads and are having a party at the end of the game instead of Stoke.
Bezu Fache Fox
Well-Known Member
Just annoyed I can't go. Couldn't have applied earlier either as I didn't know where I was going to be. Hope Sky show it.
Lets hope the 2,000 that have been able to get tickets really get behind the lads and are having a party at the end of the game instead of Stoke.
I think it would be better if both sets of fans were celebrating at the end.
Durham Fox
El Dude Brother.
I'm just really releived I'm not going. Going to find something else to do during the game too.
Something more fun than being at the Britannia. Like trapping various body parts in mouse traps?
Nottingham Fox
Moderator
Southampton to lose tonight and on Sunday and us losing on Sunday would suit me down to the ground :icon_cool
Yorkshire Vixen
Active Member
highland fox
New Member
bocadillo
Water Gypsy
No, he didn't - and I can't imagine why he is saying he did.
Melton is quite aware that he is only one infraction from a ban after his last round of nonsense. If he had been infracted today, he would now be banned - which he isn't.
bocadillo
Water Gypsy
I sincerely hope that the next time we play them at the Walkers, we remember that we are not obliged to give them any more than 2,000 tickets.
Lets hope the 2,000 that have been able to get tickets really get behind the lads and are having a party at the end of the game instead of spending a drunken weekend in Edinburgh with a gay trainee accountant.
Quite.
homer
Well-Known Member
That might be a long, long way away
bocadillo
Water Gypsy
Melton Fox
Dancing Queen
OK, just re-read it.
I feel truly "let off" and relieved that it was just an official warning and not an official "infraction". I am humbled.
TBH, I didn't know there was a difference. I see standing in the corner, and standing outside the class as two similar punishments. I am now fully educated.
Anyway, if my crime was a "threat of physical violence" how come I've only been given a warning? Is it not a more serious offence than that? Or was it just felt that a "gesture" should be made?
bocadillo
Water Gypsy
I presume that it was thought that nobody would want the forum to be without your often-witty repartee.
Last edited:
Melton Fox
Dancing Queen
I take it the question is answerless then :icon_roll
bocadillo
Water Gypsy
bocadillo
Water Gypsy
Sorry - that is MY answer. I would not seek to speak for everybody.
- Status
Championship
| P | Pld | Pts | |
| 1 | Leicester | 45 | 97 |
| 2 | Leeds Utd | 45 | 90 |
| 3 | Ipswich | 44 | 90 |
| 4 | Southampton | 45 | 84 |
| 5 | Norwich City | 45 | 73 |
| 6 | West Brom | 45 | 72 |
| 7 | Hull City | 45 | 70 |
| 8 | Middlesbro | 45 | 66 |
| 9 | Coventry City | 44 | 64 |
| 10 | Preston | 45 | 63 |
| 11 | Bristol City | 45 | 62 |
| 12 | Cardiff City | 45 | 62 |
| 13 | Swansea City | 45 | 57 |
| 14 | Watford | 45 | 56 |
| 15 | Sunderland | 45 | 56 |
| 16 | Millwall | 45 | 56 |
| 17 | QPR | 45 | 53 |
| 18 | Stoke City | 45 | 53 |
| 19 | Blackburn | 45 | 50 |
| 20 | Sheffield W | 45 | 50 |
| 21 | Plymouth | 45 | 48 |
| 22 | Birmingham | 45 | 47 |
| 23 | Huddersfield | 45 | 45 |
| 24 | Rotherham Utd | 45 | 24 |
