I'm with Highland on this one. I liked Ollie, but I witnessed that last game of the season and it can only be put down to tactics as to why we didn't win that game. We had a couple of chances towards the end of the game, but only after he'd put Hume up front. Why wasn't he playing there all game? Because Ollie put him on the wing. I firmly believe that if Hume had been up front with Steve H from the start, we probably would have scored 2 or 3. But he wasn't so we didn't.
I don't particularly care what other's credentials are - they haven't managed LCFC yet. Ollie has and he failed dismally and played rubbish tactics to boot. If the tactics were good and players goosed it up, then fair enough, but it wasn't the players. Not really. As far as I'm concerned, he deserved to go based on that game alone.
Whoever else we get may have rubbish credentials, but I won't be upset at the loss of Ollie and will never say "ollie would have done better" when the new guy fails, because I firmly believe that he wouldn't.
And like I say, I was pro-ollie.