drummindefender
Active Member
DJ clearly doesn't want to play for Leicester, so he wouldn't bang the goals in if he played for us anyway
Ollie still wants him but reckons it's unlikely.
Apparently, despite not wanting to play for us or scoring a goal for us last season, his wages have now risen because of us getting promoted ... might be a problem in geting rid.
I personally think it's Holloway talking shite as per usual.
But he signed when we were in the Championship, and we haven't been promoted out of that league. How does that work then? Did he take a wage cut when we were relegated?
Standard procedure now, i think.
For several grand a week, I could hang around two yards offside looking disinterested. If that's what they want...It does however mean that Holloway needs to search for a replacement for the loan star. And what a replacement he must be to fill Campbell's boots.
Of course unlike other managers Ian Holloway would know all the details of Campbell's contract. There is no doubt that Campbell's performances for Leicester were generally poor and his performances for Blackpool generally good. It would be interesting to know what reason Campbell himself gives for this - and what reasons the coaches of Leicester and Blackpool give.
score a few goals next season.
That my friend is the problem.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 21 | 50 |
2 | Arsenal | 22 | 44 |
3 | Nottm F | 22 | 44 |
4 | Chelsea | 22 | 40 |
5 | Manchester C | 22 | 38 |
6 | Newcastle | 22 | 38 |
7 | Bournemouth | 22 | 37 |
8 | Aston Villa | 22 | 36 |
9 | Brighton | 22 | 34 |
10 | Fulham | 22 | 33 |
11 | Brentford | 22 | 28 |
12 | Palace | 22 | 27 |
13 | Manchester U | 22 | 26 |
14 | West Ham | 22 | 26 |
15 | Tottenham | 22 | 24 |
16 | Everton | 21 | 20 |
17 | Wolves | 22 | 16 |
18 | Ipswich | 22 | 16 |
19 | Leicester | 22 | 14 |
20 | Southampton | 22 | 6 |