Hazzman
New Member
Why wouldn't 30m be sustainable if they have money, I would bet there are a fair number of teams in this division with similar.
It's sustainable as along as they put the money up, when they no longer want to cover it, it's tits up. If the debt was manageable, then that wouldn't happen if so and so pulled out. That's the gap Mandaric's left us. All interviews with the Thai on this matter suggest they are doing the same, registering the debt against the club rather themselves like Chelsea and Man City do. It gives them an escape route with causing too much financial damage to themselves, the club feels the hit instead.
I am also failing to see how a loss of £6 million, then onto the next season a loss of £7 million is a sign of decreasing debts, year on year.
Last edited: