England v India 1st test

Log in to stop seeing adverts

Status
Not open for further replies.
If you think about it, India didn't bowl too badly in general. Not enough runs on the board. Suppose we took 20 wickets :icon_cool

I really do think, India are good enough to beat England, if it wasn't for the first day, England would've lost; the pitch was perfect and the bowling was poor, weather changed the pitch and changed the game, it was a bowling pitch after day 1.


If,if,if :icon_lol:
 
Nope, i must be the only one who thinks Sreesanth is sh*te.

If you think about it, India didn't bowl too badly in general. Not enough runs on the board. Suppose we took 20 wickets :icon_cool

I really do think, India are good enough to beat England, if it wasn't for the first day, England would've lost; the pitch was perfect and the bowling was poor, weather changed the pitch and changed the game, it was a bowling pitch after day 1.
Well I saw him bowl a lot on sky against SA and he certainly has something about him. You really can't see it? Hmmm ok. You must be the only one who thinks Agarkar is good too. Although if you want to play a guy with a test bowling average of 47 then I would be delighted.

I think the problem with the batting is that you have a lot of guys who do just enough to stay in the side. Ganguly, Laxman, Karthik, Kaif, Yuvraj etc always seem to get 30s and 40s which while keep their averages healthy enough don't really win matches. I wonder who the new coach will be but I hope hes bold enough to drop these hangers on once and for all.

I would play...
Sehwag
Jaffer
Dravid
Tendulkar
Tiwary
Raina
Dhoni
Kumble
Zaheer Khan
Munaf Patel
Sreesanth

Then after a while ease out Tendulkar, Kumble and Khan for Sharma, Chawla and RP Singh.
 
Well I saw him bowl a lot on sky against SA and he certainly has something about him. You really can't see it? Hmmm ok. You must be the only one who thinks Agarkar is good too. Although if you want to play a guy with a test bowling average of 47 then I would be delighted.

I think the problem with the batting is that you have a lot of guys who do just enough to stay in the side. Ganguly, Laxman, Karthik, Kaif, Yuvraj etc always seem to get 30s and 40s which while keep their averages healthy enough don't really win matches. I wonder who the new coach will be but I hope hes bold enough to drop these hangers on once and for all.

I would play...
Sehwag
Jaffer
Dravid
Tendulkar
Tiwary
Raina
Dhoni
Kumble
Zaheer Khan
Munaf Patel
Sreesanth

Then after a while ease out Tendulkar, Kumble and Khan for Sharma, Chawla and RP Singh.

I cannot believe i forgot Raina :icon_cry:

I admit Sreesanth played well vs SA. But I would put Pathan, Agarkar (sp) & even Munaf Patel before him, I really don't rate him.

Also good point about the coach, i can see the likes of Tendulkar & Kumble retiring some time soon.

Bowling has been a problem of India's for some time, and i hope the new coach can do something about it.

As for the batters they are too inconsistent and are always a let down. .'ve said this many times before, but i'll say it again.. Yuvraj should be in the team i really rate him and would probably say he is bar Dravid our best batter.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

Championship

P Pld Pts
1Leicester4697
2Ipswich4696
3Leeds Utd4690
4Southampton4687
5West Brom4675
6Norwich City4673
7Hull City4670
8Middlesbro4669
9Coventry City4664
10Preston 4663
11Bristol City4662
12Cardiff City4662
13Millwall4659
14Swansea City4657
15Watford4656
16Sunderland4656
17Stoke City4656
18QPR4656
19Blackburn 4653
20Sheffield W4653
21Plymouth 4651
22Birmingham4650
23Huddersfield4645
24Rotherham Utd4627
Top