beaumontfox
New Member
Only too well! I feel sorry for Sidekick putting up with you all day at away games:icon_razz
Don't forget I know where you live! :icon_biggOnly too well! I feel sorry for Sidekick putting up with you all day at away games:icon_razz
Ever heard of libel laws, this is obviously complete tosh
Yes yes yes! we have heard of libel laws. do you intend to use them in the context of the original post?
PS - how many members do you have?
The Trust board would not use money to bet on anything.
As a further principal we have never accepted offers from organisations that wanted us to add links (for a referral click fee) to betting sites on the Trust website
As a further principal we have never accepted offers from organisations that wanted us to add links (for a referral click fee) to betting sites on the Trust website
Is that the royal 'we'? Or are you representing somebody else?
Do try to keep up, that's already been answered
I speak on behalf of my constituency of 939,900 leicestershire folk.
my shire, my voice
No it hasn't. Its been quoted from another source. There has been no answer to either question so far.
Yes yes yes! we have heard of libel laws. do you intend to use them in the context of the original post? I look forward to your response - a yes or a no will suffice. But please do respond - I note that many FT questions here go unanswered
PS - how many members do you have?
So, in summary, 2 questions seeking 2 answers.
Over to you
We will not answer question 2. This only ever gets asked of us but no other supporters organisations or indeed the club itself. Members of the Trust have the information annually at the AGM
Why is it such a big deal? Presumably you've got nothing to hide?
I think you'll find that when you bleat about the club not disclosing all the details of the owners and then flat out refuse to simply disclose how many members you have you end up coming across as hypocrites.
The Trust is significantly smaller than the supporters club and has less respect from the management at City.
Have 'the management' told you that?
There really is no point in asking the Trust about the number of members the organisation has, it has been shown on numerous occasions that they are not prepared to divulge the information and it really makes no difference to the debate. The Trusts role with the club is peripheral at the best as they never reached membership levels that force the owners to take any notice of them.
The Trust is significantly smaller than the supporters club and has less respect from the management at City.
and has less respect from the management at City.
Not sure how you can state this as neither organisation circulates its membership numbers, nor indeed do the ISA or DISA
So you're saying it's an incredibly small minority that nobody, least of all the club, should actually pay the slightest bit of attention to? I'll carry on ignoring them thenI can state this because it is a fact, the trust may not circulate membership numbers but they have been disclosed to certain parties when the trust has been pushed, I must admit I was surprised how poorly they stacked up.
The ISA, let's think:Not sure how you can state this as neither organisation circulates its membership numbers, nor indeed do the ISA
The ISA, let's think:
1. Lance Tomlyn.
2. Err, that's it.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 21 | 50 |
2 | Arsenal | 22 | 44 |
3 | Nottm F | 22 | 44 |
4 | Manchester C | 22 | 38 |
5 | Newcastle | 22 | 38 |
6 | Chelsea | 21 | 37 |
7 | Bournemouth | 22 | 37 |
8 | Aston Villa | 22 | 36 |
9 | Brighton | 22 | 34 |
10 | Fulham | 22 | 33 |
11 | Brentford | 22 | 28 |
12 | Palace | 22 | 27 |
13 | Manchester U | 22 | 26 |
14 | West Ham | 22 | 26 |
15 | Tottenham | 22 | 24 |
16 | Everton | 21 | 20 |
17 | Wolves | 21 | 16 |
18 | Ipswich | 22 | 16 |
19 | Leicester | 22 | 14 |
20 | Southampton | 22 | 6 |