But why then would he return to Sunderland? The position there hasn't changed (i.e. no keeper injuries).
and he let in 4!!!! :icon_cry::icon_cry::icon_cry::icon_cry::icon_cry::icon_cry:
But why then would he return to Sunderland? The position there hasn't changed (i.e. no keeper injuries).
Oh, bollocks to it. Feck knows.
But to be fair he had a very inexperienced defence in front of him
maybe there was an agreement that leicester could buy fulop for X amount during his loan, after his loan has finished sunderland can demand more.
i'm gonna pop along to the bookies to put my money on us getting ****ing thrashed tomorrow
They did drop there 9 million pound keeper the other week....
EDIT: sorry 'rested there 9 million pound keeper'
and the reports said he did rather well. But that was from the Mockery
What a load of horseshit.
The only player worth keeping and he's gone. ****ing disaster.
But personally I reckon we had an agreed price at a certain amount and after his excellent form, Sunderland reckon they can get more for him - either from us or elsewhere.
That's my theory.
Unless they've already agreed a deal for him, then it still seems weird recalling him now.
If Neilson was a good keeper, we wouldn't have brought in Fulop. I find this theory a simple one to grasp.
If Neilson was a good keeper, we wouldn't have brought in Fulop. I find this theory a simple one to grasp.
probably homesick the poor love
line 1 or 2?
same here
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 23 | 56 |
2 | Arsenal | 23 | 47 |
3 | Nottm F | 24 | 47 |
4 | Manchester C | 23 | 41 |
5 | Newcastle | 24 | 41 |
6 | Chelsea | 23 | 40 |
7 | Bournemouth | 24 | 40 |
8 | Aston Villa | 24 | 37 |
9 | Fulham | 24 | 36 |
10 | Brighton | 24 | 34 |
11 | Brentford | 23 | 31 |
12 | Manchester U | 23 | 29 |
13 | Palace | 23 | 27 |
14 | West Ham | 23 | 27 |
15 | Everton | 23 | 26 |
16 | Tottenham | 23 | 24 |
17 | Wolves | 24 | 19 |
18 | Leicester | 24 | 17 |
19 | Ipswich | 24 | 16 |
20 | Southampton | 24 | 9 |