spionfox
Well-Known Member
I don't consider taking the piss out of a religion to be offensive
Maybe not offensive to you, but do you accept that it could be offensive to those who do have religious beliefs?
I don't consider taking the piss out of a religion to be offensive
Maybe not offensive to you, but do you accept that it could be offensive to those who do have religious beliefs?
Maybe not offensive to you, but do you accept that it could be offensive to those who do have religious beliefs?
It could be, but that's their problem.
Some people will be offended if we take the piss out of their football team, their weight, their taste in music etc. Why should their belief in the supernatural be treated any differently?
It could be, but that's their problem.
Some people will be offended if we take the piss out of their football team, their weight, their taste in music etc. Why should their belief in the supernatural be treated any differently?
It could be, but that's their problem.
Some people will be offended if we take the piss out of their football team, their weight, their taste in music etc. Why should their belief in the supernatural be treated any differently?
Didn't Newts get an infraction for saying something that was deemed to be offensive? I don't get this place, on one hand Newts get's his infraction for making a comment in The General Rules Forum but then mods come out in defence of Macky and say that you can say what you like in there. Then Biff says someone looks like Harold Shipman and everyone cries again? What are the rules here because from where I'm sitting it looks like the people with the power are getting a bit big for their boots and are enforcing a 'do as I say not as I do' policy.
I'd like to note by the way that I find none of what's been said offensive.
Didn't Newts get an infraction for saying something that was deemed to be offensive? I don't get this place, on one hand Newts get's his infraction for making a comment in The General Rules Forum but then mods come out in defence of Macky and say that you can say what you like in there. Then Biff says someone looks like Harold Shipman and everyone cries again? What are the rules here because from where I'm sitting it looks like the people with the power are getting a bit big for their boots and are enforcing a 'do as I say not as I do' policy.
I'd like to note by the way that I find none of what's been said offensive.
My main point was, which he admitted to, was that he could be as offensive as me, and is in no position to lecture me on my comments.
Don'T ever become a politician.
What if someone called you a 'fat bastard' Jeff, you wouldn't be offended .
Didn't Newts get an infraction for saying something that was deemed to be offensive? I don't get this place, on one hand Newts get's his infraction for making a comment in The General Rules Forum but then mods come out in defence of Macky and say that you can say what you like in there. Then Biff says someone looks like Harold Shipman and everyone cries again? What are the rules here because from where I'm sitting it looks like the people with the power are getting a bit big for their boots and are enforcing a 'do as I say not as I do' policy.
I'd like to note by the way that I find none of what's been said offensive.
Biff hasn't received an infraction, and I can't remember anyone crying because of anything he's said.
People call me that all the time. They have a point, I am overweight, and it's my own fault.
That answer isn't exactly conducive to a tolerant attitude and indeed sounds more than a little arrogant.
Biff hasn't received an infraction, and I can't remember anyone crying because of anything he's said.
you, as a mod, have since said that anything anyone finds offensive is "their problem".
It seems that really, in this case anyway, someone has (again) looked to mock and patronise somebody for starting a thread and when there was a bit of retaliation some very pink and very fluffy toys got thrown out of a pram.
Maybe not offensive to you, but do you accept that it could be offensive to those who do have religious beliefs?
It could be, but that's their problem.
Some people will be offended if we take the piss out of their football team, their weight, their taste in music etc. Why should their belief in the supernatural be treated any differently?
I didn't say that.
I know Biff hasn't had an infraction but Newts got one for saying something offensive, whilst you, as a mod, have since said that anything anyone finds offensive is "their problem".
I'm trying to understand why sometimes when somebody says something it is OK and other times it's not. It seems that really, in this case anyway, someone has (again) looked to mock and patronise somebody for starting a thread and when there was a bit of retaliation some very pink and very fluffy toys got thrown out of a pram (and like the crying comment previously Jeff I don't mean that literally).
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 19 | 46 |
2 | Arsenal | 20 | 40 |
3 | Nottm F | 20 | 40 |
4 | Chelsea | 20 | 36 |
5 | Newcastle | 20 | 35 |
6 | Manchester C | 20 | 34 |
7 | Bournemouth | 20 | 33 |
8 | Aston Villa | 20 | 32 |
9 | Fulham | 20 | 30 |
10 | Brighton | 20 | 28 |
11 | Brentford | 20 | 27 |
12 | Tottenham | 20 | 24 |
13 | Manchester U | 20 | 23 |
14 | West Ham | 20 | 23 |
15 | Palace | 20 | 21 |
16 | Everton | 19 | 17 |
17 | Wolves | 20 | 16 |
18 | Ipswich | 20 | 16 |
19 | Leicester | 20 | 14 |
20 | Southampton | 20 | 6 |