Hopefully after he rejected a permo move because of wages, we told him to **** off.
Why?
Rejecting a transfer due to wages suggests to me he sees us as nothing more than a cash cow. He values money more than playing.
But I thought he had started every game for hull this season plus would you take a new job with a pay cut?
If you're using the ol' let's compare a footballer to the average bloke's job, here we go:-
I wouldn't take a new job with a pay cut but if my employers (in this instance Hull) said we can't afford your wages and soon we won't be able to play you (dare I say pay). In effect losing your job, yeh I'd take a job with a pay cut.
We have this silly argument everytime when it comes to players salaries. :icon_roll
Why should he leave, if they are that skint how can they afford Harper, Solano, Koren? All new signings.
If you're using the ol' let's compare a footballer to the average bloke's job, here we go:-
I wouldn't take a new job with a pay cut but if my employers (in this instance Hull) said we can't afford your wages and soon we won't be able to play you (dare I say pay). In effect losing your job, yeh I'd take a job with a pay cut.
You forget that if his employer goes into administration, football debts have to be cleared first. So our footballer knows that whatever happens to the club, he will be paid in full. So why on earth would he (or you) opt for a pay cut?
Behind most players there is a mercenary agent and a perhaps an even more mercenary wife. My guess is that if players want to think in terms of loyalty or even being happy at a club a footballers wife will soon put a stop to that.
He can keep getting stupid wages at Hull knowing that if they went tits up he'd most likely have a job to walk into.
According to the Mirror on 3 Sept, we are going to pay some of his stupid wages.
Did you expect him to play for us without us paying some of his stupid wages?
That article, if it's true, is suggesting that Hull will pay him off to make up for the drop in wages when he moves here permanently. We've done similar things with our overpaid players in the past.
No! I am just concerned that just some of his stupid (reportedly £20,000 per week) wages may still be a stupid amount.
Why does that concern you?
He's the mystery investor.
Yeah, I invest in a season ticket and have supported Leicester for 57 years. Does that not entitle me to be concerned (i.e., worried) about the financial health of the club?
Yeah, I invest in a season ticket and have supported Leicester for 57 years. Does that not entitle me to be concerned (i.e., worried) about the financial health of the club?
Just to clarify, is that 57 honest years? - man and boy?
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 21 | 50 |
2 | Arsenal | 22 | 44 |
3 | Nottm F | 22 | 44 |
4 | Manchester C | 22 | 38 |
5 | Newcastle | 22 | 38 |
6 | Chelsea | 21 | 37 |
7 | Bournemouth | 22 | 37 |
8 | Aston Villa | 22 | 36 |
9 | Brighton | 22 | 34 |
10 | Fulham | 22 | 33 |
11 | Brentford | 22 | 28 |
12 | Palace | 22 | 27 |
13 | Manchester U | 22 | 26 |
14 | West Ham | 22 | 26 |
15 | Tottenham | 22 | 24 |
16 | Everton | 21 | 20 |
17 | Wolves | 21 | 16 |
18 | Ipswich | 22 | 16 |
19 | Leicester | 22 | 14 |
20 | Southampton | 22 | 6 |