Whist I accept that RK has to go, nominating replacements on "well he's better than Kelly" criteria is not good enough, yes, Hoddle, Robson, Keegan et al , may well be better than Kelly, but are they good enough to enable the club to achieve its ambitions. Adams was probably better than Kelly, next door's dog is probably better than Kelly, however, 'better' is not good enough, is he capable of taking us to the Premiership and keeping us there, if so then fine and good, but if we're looking at people just because they are better than Kelly, then, sorry, but that ain't enough.