Having read all these posts, impassioned and generally supportive of MA, I am amazed at the affect a win at Gillingham seems to have had on a group of supportes who, for the most part, were (me included) calling for the manager's head after the QPR game. What's changed? We don't know the facts (as Gary Silke has pointed out, the OS is not for earthlings) and I'm disinclined to give MA the benefit of the doubt. Even if Keown had muttered behind MA's back, it's more likely isn't it that he did so because his public views on MA's shambolic tinkerings were invited to rest where the sun don't shine by MA? As far as I'm concerned this is further evidence of poor man management skills, and quite possibly a calculated move to remove from the Board's consideration one of the candidates to replace him.
Adams out!
Adams out!