bocadillo
Water Gypsy
I believe the tax at stake is circa £50,000, so I don't think that has anything at all with our finances. The one thing that is for sure is that the club is losing money week in week out. That probably has more to do with not lashing out loads of dosh in the transfer window ( like almost every other Champo club I might add ). If the money ain't there, don't try to spend it. We've been down that road before.
The two charges are in connection with payments of £182,500. The tax and the employees National Insurance contribution would have been payable by the recipient; MM only avoided the employer's part of the National Insurance contribution which would have been much less than £50,000. The "circa £50,000" presumably relates to the amount alleged to not have been paid by both parties.
Having said that, the important question now is not how much tax etc was avoided, but whether MM will be convicted and, if so, what the penalty might be.