Feidlimid
Active Member
Hence my question. Maybe the board have decided that their offices need a refurb.What’s the point in borrowing money when we can barely spend anyway thanks to PSR
Hence my question. Maybe the board have decided that their offices need a refurb.What’s the point in borrowing money when we can barely spend anyway thanks to PSR
It’s for the independent consultants to analyse where Rudkin and Whelan definitely haven’t made any mistakesWhat’s the point in borrowing money when we can barely spend anyway thanks to PSR.
We are indeed allowed to borrow from them. No idea why they keep borrowing from these sharks. Enormous interest sounds fun.We don't know what it will be used for. We assume the tranfer kitty, or to assist cash flow, or whatever
What I don't get is why we're taking such loans when we have a supposed money bags owner. Are we not allowed to borrow from Top/KP? Have we reached the limit on that source?
They are just a bank, and probably have more favourable interest rates. Better than going to say Barclays.We are indeed allowed to borrow from them. No idea why they keep borrowing from these sharks. Enormous interest sounds fun.
Hasn’t @Brown Nose previously looked into Macquarie and concluded their setup is geared towards football clubs (payments based on tv revenue) rather than a more traditional monthly/annual type payment?They are just a bank, and probably have more favourable interest rates. Better than going to say Barclays.
What’s the point in borrowing money when we can barely spend anyway thanks to PSR. We must be pretty near the limit as to how much more we can spend after spaffing away a shitload in the summer.
I don’t get it. If money is tight why can’t we borrow from KP and pay it back without extortionate interest. These guys like borrowing against revenue we might not have.
I'd guess KP Group is not massively cash rich??I don’t get it. If money is tight why can’t we borrow from KP and pay it back without extortionate interest. These guys like borrowing against revenue we might not have.
Fixed for youMacquarie offer competitive rates to general public for mortgages, etc so guessing their corporate rates are equally competitive. I really don't think their choice of loan provider is anything peculiar. Certainly not worth the focus it seems to be getting. I mean, we have bigger problems, don't we? I mean, wasting £25 million on a Skipp might be more concerning.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 21 | 50 |
2 | Arsenal | 22 | 44 |
3 | Nottm F | 22 | 44 |
4 | Chelsea | 22 | 40 |
5 | Manchester C | 22 | 38 |
6 | Newcastle | 22 | 38 |
7 | Bournemouth | 22 | 37 |
8 | Aston Villa | 22 | 36 |
9 | Brighton | 22 | 34 |
10 | Fulham | 22 | 33 |
11 | Brentford | 22 | 28 |
12 | Palace | 22 | 27 |
13 | Manchester U | 22 | 26 |
14 | West Ham | 22 | 26 |
15 | Tottenham | 22 | 24 |
16 | Everton | 21 | 20 |
17 | Wolves | 22 | 16 |
18 | Ipswich | 22 | 16 |
19 | Leicester | 22 | 14 |
20 | Southampton | 22 | 6 |