Leicester City set to unveil third members in the consortium
- Thread starter Mawsley
- Start date
This page may contain links to companies such as eBay and Amazon. As an affiliate of these sites I may earn commission if you click the link and make a purchase
- Status
bocadillo
Water Gypsy
Were they demanding their money back
You've just reminded me that I haven't made my compensation claim yet.
Real Sharapova
Well-Known Member
50 minutes late = no compensation.
bocadillo
Water Gypsy
50 minutes late = no compensation.
We were just over the hour late into Paddington. Leaving Reading 66 minutes late, the driver did his best to get it under the hour but just failed. :icon_bigg
Given that the FA have given their approval of clubs takeover, why is there continuing secrecy about the third member(s) of the consortium. It seems very strange to me, unless course there's to be drums, fanfares and press conferences, but even then the momentum appears to have been lost, its strange very strange indeed.
Redditch Fox
Well-Known Member
Perhaps there is a fair number of 'investors' who are involved in the consortium. I believe that there is a rule that stakeholders above a certain level have to go through the FA's 'fit person' process - but maybe there is no additional major party involved that's likely to cause any particular excitement.
bocadillo
Water Gypsy
Blue Maniac
Alzheimers sufferer
They haven't...
SJN-Fox
Well-Known Member
Stringy was trying (hard) to get the info out of MM on Monday night. He (MM) said that he would release the information soon as soon as things were sorted out.
What things and how they needed sorting wasn't revealed.
(So in other words, despite his best efforts, Stringy got nothing from MM)
What things and how they needed sorting wasn't revealed.
(So in other words, despite his best efforts, Stringy got nothing from MM)
Fox Fan
Well-Known Member
And probably never will on this subject.
Micky
Well-Known Member
camberwell fox
Well-Known Member
Not even this one...
Particularly that one.
I've got to say that at the beginning i was interested who this mystery number 3 was, this was then replaced with mild interest that has now manifested into complete apethy.
What a farce.
Well the football league approved the deal so they know who it is don't they?
homer
Well-Known Member
They can report what they like
Although the League would wish to see them comply with the spirit of the new rules, the club aren't actually obliged to reveal the info until April next year
Redditch Fox
Well-Known Member
Well as I understand it only stakeholders with a a substantial stakeholding are scrutinised by the FA - I can't recall the precise figure - but it may be 10%.
As always, I stand to be corrected on this but I think that the Foxes Trust is getting a bit over-excited by this and the strong likelihood as Homer points out is that the club is operating within FA rules on its reporting of matters.
Durham Fox
El Dude Brother.
It is 10% but it's the Football League doing the scrutinising not the FA.
- Status
| P | Pld | Pts | |
| 1 | Liverpool | 21 | 50 |
| 2 | Arsenal | 22 | 44 |
| 3 | Nottm F | 22 | 44 |
| 4 | Manchester C | 22 | 38 |
| 5 | Newcastle | 22 | 38 |
| 6 | Chelsea | 21 | 37 |
| 7 | Bournemouth | 22 | 37 |
| 8 | Aston Villa | 22 | 36 |
| 9 | Brighton | 22 | 34 |
| 10 | Fulham | 22 | 33 |
| 11 | Brentford | 22 | 28 |
| 12 | Palace | 22 | 27 |
| 13 | Manchester U | 22 | 26 |
| 14 | West Ham | 22 | 26 |
| 15 | Tottenham | 22 | 24 |
| 16 | Everton | 21 | 20 |
| 17 | Wolves | 21 | 16 |
| 18 | Ipswich | 22 | 16 |
| 19 | Leicester | 22 | 14 |
| 20 | Southampton | 22 | 6 |
