Leicester City set to unveil third members in the consortium
- Thread starter Mawsley
- Start date
This page may contain links to companies such as eBay and Amazon. As an affiliate of these sites I may earn commission if you click the link and make a purchase
- Status
homer
Well-Known Member
If only - it's for 'Extreme Fishing with Robson Greene'
Very big in Asia, according to my inside informant
Ike O'Noclassed
Well-Known Member
Load of carp.
Macky
Gruntled Member
Down to some kind of dodgy dealing, no doubt. Definitely something fishy about it
Foxes_Trust
Well-Known Member
Thanks for reminding the club via this message board that this will be the case
Biffa Bacon
Well-Known Member
Wow, I bet they are really worried now.
Foxes_Trust
Well-Known Member
The Football League were promised by the club that the club would release the information to fans quickly after the deal was ratified, they will be far from happy that hasn't happened.
The FL will not want the effectiveness of the new transparency rules brought into question the very first time they have been applied.
Nottingham Fox
Moderator
So one minute, they've left you in charge monitoring this?
I would have thought one of their own peeps would have been keeping a close eye on the situation, and if they were uncomfortable with it, they would have spoken to the club without the need for the life saving Foxes Trust to get involved.
SilverFox
Well-Known Member
Representatives of the club read this stuff?!?!?
Foxes_Trust
Well-Known Member
Oh yes, we (and others) have been taken to task previously on message board posts
Steven
Active Member
Why not follow the money? It would seem likely to me that it would be easy enough to trace the company(-ies) owning Leicester City or else the League fit and proper test is worth **** all. :icon_conf
Steven
Active Member
On the basis of "know thine enemy". :icon_wink
Foxes_Trust
Well-Known Member
Without going into details on the process, it would be accurate to say that the FL think a Trust would be the most appropriate body to raise concerns over the transparency process not yielding information to fans as intended.
In summary, the fans should make the complaint to the FL, who would then act.
From our direct conversations with The Football League during this takeover ratification it has become clear that the FL have regular dialogue with Supporters Direct, and have a full understanding of the kind of issues where Trusts are likely to get involved
Mawsley
Well-Known Member
Mawsley
Well-Known Member
Is that the one that's "100% supporters, 100% compensation" or "100% compensation, just 100% compensation"?
GazLCFC
Active Member
I don't believe you. If the club read this site.....
The kop would have moved to the other end
They would have stopped the goal music
Started selling monster munch
Got rid of jobber
Banned the Fosseboys.
Allowed flags
Got ladbrokes back in
Sacked birch
kanefire166
New Member
lol all tv rights sport i guess
Miles Away
Well-Known Member
Are they dreadfully worried about my ankle? Please, Milan and Top, dont worry, I am recovering just fine.
Miles Away
Well-Known Member
Could have at least put a SPOILER ALERT on it you miserable little man.
- Status
| P | Pld | Pts | |
| 1 | Liverpool | 21 | 50 |
| 2 | Arsenal | 22 | 44 |
| 3 | Nottm F | 22 | 44 |
| 4 | Manchester C | 22 | 38 |
| 5 | Newcastle | 22 | 38 |
| 6 | Chelsea | 21 | 37 |
| 7 | Bournemouth | 22 | 37 |
| 8 | Aston Villa | 22 | 36 |
| 9 | Brighton | 22 | 34 |
| 10 | Fulham | 22 | 33 |
| 11 | Brentford | 22 | 28 |
| 12 | Palace | 22 | 27 |
| 13 | Manchester U | 22 | 26 |
| 14 | West Ham | 22 | 26 |
| 15 | Tottenham | 22 | 24 |
| 16 | Everton | 21 | 20 |
| 17 | Wolves | 21 | 16 |
| 18 | Ipswich | 22 | 16 |
| 19 | Leicester | 22 | 14 |
| 20 | Southampton | 22 | 6 |
