None of it is a joke at your expense, trust me. It’s hard to put your finger on why certain things become tropes on here but this one honestly isn’t aimed at you. Your honest mistake has become a recurring joke, like I say it’s the way of the forum.
Anyone would think England have a wealth of creative attacking players and that they have been winning matches without playing Maddison.
He's got better numbers than all of them and hadn't played a single minute.
He was injured for the first two matches and hasn't played much for England. I think he should have come on instead of Mount as well but the moaning about it is getting a bit dull.
To avoid having to justify why he didn’t pick him in the squad announcement press conference. One and only reason: Maddison picking up an injury was perfect for the gormless twat.
That may indeed be childish and pathetic. But that doesn’t apply to me.
Why do you want them to lose then?
The clue is in his answer
Imagine quoting the answer to ask what the answer is. Amazing.
It's not a well written answer at all, let's be honest.
no
| P | Pld | Pts | |
| 1 | Leicester | 44 | 94 |
| 2 | Leeds Utd | 44 | 90 |
| 3 | Ipswich | 43 | 89 |
| 4 | Southampton | 44 | 84 |
| 5 | West Brom | 44 | 72 |
| 6 | Norwich City | 44 | 72 |
| 7 | Hull City | 43 | 66 |
| 8 | Coventry City | 42 | 63 |
| 9 | Middlesbro | 44 | 63 |
| 10 | Preston | 44 | 63 |
| 11 | Cardiff City | 44 | 62 |
| 12 | Bristol City | 44 | 59 |
| 13 | Sunderland | 44 | 56 |
| 14 | Swansea City | 44 | 56 |
| 15 | Watford | 44 | 53 |
| 16 | Millwall | 44 | 53 |
| 17 | Stoke City | 44 | 50 |
| 18 | QPR | 44 | 50 |
| 19 | Blackburn | 44 | 49 |
| 20 | Plymouth | 44 | 48 |
| 21 | Sheffield W | 44 | 47 |
| 22 | Birmingham | 44 | 46 |
| 23 | Huddersfield | 44 | 44 |
| 24 | Rotherham Utd | 44 | 24 |
