Yes, but the article plainly states that the club would only receive £1m. Either you didn't read it or you somehow didn't understand that part.hes certainly upset the gers fans by stating officially he wants to leave...fact
The club is entitled to the amount that would have been paid in wages to the player up to the end of his contract, so it's not really a 'free transfer' - someone has to pay.If he invokes the Webster clause, as the article suggests, wouldn't he be available as a free transfer?
Then the money the club would be spending would go back to the player?
Basically he receives his own transfer fee, sort of?
One would hope so, but it's not a requirement. Seems unlikely a player would invoke the clause without having a new club lined up.So the player pays 1m to become a free agent then city, for example, would compensate the player the 1m in a signing on fee?
It also says that Everton are missing out on Miroslav Klose. He's been angling after a move to us for ages now
This may have been mentioned before, but SSN have said that Miroslav Klose is joining Valencia.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 21 | 50 |
2 | Arsenal | 22 | 44 |
3 | Nottm F | 21 | 41 |
4 | Newcastle | 22 | 38 |
5 | Chelsea | 21 | 37 |
6 | Bournemouth | 22 | 37 |
7 | Aston Villa | 22 | 36 |
8 | Manchester C | 21 | 35 |
9 | Fulham | 22 | 33 |
10 | Brighton | 21 | 31 |
11 | Brentford | 22 | 28 |
12 | Palace | 22 | 27 |
13 | Manchester U | 21 | 26 |
14 | West Ham | 22 | 26 |
15 | Tottenham | 21 | 24 |
16 | Everton | 20 | 17 |
17 | Wolves | 21 | 16 |
18 | Ipswich | 21 | 16 |
19 | Leicester | 22 | 14 |
20 | Southampton | 21 | 6 |