Mahrez

Log in to stop seeing adverts

Status
Not open for further replies.
Relates to the amount of transfer activity involving him.
 
So our best player in these two games so far is the one that is leaving!

We truly are fecked if CS thinks that Gray can replace him at the moment.

Why the feck did we spend £30million+ on a striker who only appears to be able to use his feet for standing upright, rather than kicking the ball into the net?
 
Blimey, that's good of him. Didn't realise Mahrez was the one that decided though.

Or... just shit journalism?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2038.jpg
    IMG_2038.jpg
    36 KB · Views: 49
In all fairness, he did score yesterday!

Yes, but again with his head. Who is going to put in those particular type of crosses for him on a regular basis?

Mahrez, for maybe a few more weeks?

Albrighton, if he is on the appropriate wing?

Fuchs, with one of his excellent long throws, if he is picked?
 
He already did he signed a five year contract.

Exactly, he chose to come here. No one forced him to. He can turn down a move to Rome if he wants to.
 
Why the **** do players want to play for Arsenal?

From overachievers to embarrassing underachievers, great move.
 
Why the **** do players want to play for Arsenal?

From overachievers to embarrassing underachievers, great move.

Shit loads of money and the potential to sit entire seasons out on the treatment table. Plus he's French.
 
You don't think he gets a right to decide where he plays his football and brings up his children?

I do, absolutely, but he doesn't get the opportunity to make the decision as to whether the club accepts the initial offer. Which is what the excerpt actually says.
 
I do, absolutely, but he doesn't get the opportunity to make the decision as to whether the club accepts the initial offer. Which is what the excerpt actually says.

The thing that was posted is a copy of something the Sun said, not a quote from Mahrez. Nowhere in the article (here - https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/4077145/arsenal-transfer-news-riyad-mahrez-leicester/ ) does it contain a quote from Mahrez.
Nowhere in the article does it say what the source of this "information" is.
This is the same paper that a few days ago said Mahrez had agreed personal terms with Roma. Why would he do that if he only wants to go to Arsenal?

Typical tabloid nonsense.
 
Lots of tabloid and Internet rubbish at the moment. I wonder how much comes from Mahrez agent and how much is tabloid BS. I would imagine (hope) that whenever the price tag of 30-35 million is mentioned that is his agent desperately trying to bring his price down.

The market has gone insane. We should be demanding a minimum of 45 million.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

P Pld Pts
1Liverpool1128
2Manchester C  1123
3Chelsea1119
4Arsenal1119
5Nottm F1119
6Brighton1119
7Fulham1118
8Newcastle1118
9Aston Villa1118
10Tottenham 1116
11Brentford1116
12Bournemouth1115
13Manchester U1115
14West Ham1112
15Leicester1110
16Everton1110
17Ipswich118
18Palace117
19Wolves116
20Southampton114

Latest posts

Back
Top