SJN-Fox
Well-Known Member
But we are a more attractiv investment proposition with our current squad intact and I suspect that is where MM's priorities lie.
Milan
- Thread starter maccfox
- Start date
This page may contain links to companies such as eBay and Amazon. As an affiliate of these sites I may earn commission if you click the link and make a purchase
- Status
But we are a more attractiv investment proposition with our current squad intact and I suspect that is where MM's priorities lie.
Macky
Gruntled Member
Of course. Who has tried to stop you expressing an opinion?
We're discussing your opinion, isn't that what forums are about?
I'll let you off, big boy
Miles Away
Well-Known Member
If we don't have any money I'd rather our brass was aware of it and didn't overextend themselves further than submit to the demands of a manager.
Nothing wrong with a bit of fiscal responsibility is there? And I don't blame Pearson for leaving if that is the case...but I certainly don't blame Milan either if he is trying to cut costs.
Nothing wrong with a bit of fiscal responsibility is there? And I don't blame Pearson for leaving if that is the case...but I certainly don't blame Milan either if he is trying to cut costs.
homer
Well-Known Member
It's OK - the Foxes trust are on the case
The reply is on it's way to them already, I suspect
Babylon
Active Member
drummindefender
Active Member
:icon_lol:
Macky
Gruntled Member
PHEW!! Thank **** for that.
I hope he answers all of the questions quickly, because I'm not leaving my PC till I see his response. This could get messy.
Cate Fox
Well-Known Member
you just have to keep referring to lolhello dont you :icon_lol:
Macky
Gruntled Member
:icon_lol: :icon_lol:
I think that Milan may not have a lot of time left in charge at Leicester. He's been here three & half years so far but, personally, I can't see him making another two.
Today we lost a top manager, what will happen if we loose the owner? You never know, we might get some stability if that happens - It'd be a change.
Today we lost a top manager, what will happen if we loose the owner? You never know, we might get some stability if that happens - It'd be a change.
David Gwilliam
Well-Known Member
As I have put on another thread I have been told that Hobbs has already been sold and that is why Pearson is leaving.
Macky
Gruntled Member
How exactly could we loose (sic) the owner?
homer
Well-Known Member
He just made a simple spelling error Macky, FFS leave him alone
He meant to say 'what will happen if we goose the owner'
A question I think we would all like to see the answer to
Siouxsie
Moderator
I can't get the link to work :icon_cry:
Last edited by a moderator:
Macky
Gruntled Member
Well, that does actually make more sense than 'loose' or 'lose'
spionfox
Well-Known Member
I've now got visions of 'Big Gay Following' from 'Balls of Steel' chasing after Milan saying, "Do you want a bum?"
SilverFox
Well-Known Member
I've gotta agree with everything this guy is saying:-
http://www.thebluearmy.co.uk/news/L...aric-task/article-2360833-detail/article.html
http://www.thebluearmy.co.uk/news/L...aric-task/article-2360833-detail/article.html
- Status
| P | Pld | Pts | |
| 1 | Liverpool | 21 | 50 |
| 2 | Arsenal | 22 | 44 |
| 3 | Nottm F | 22 | 44 |
| 4 | Chelsea | 22 | 40 |
| 5 | Manchester C | 22 | 38 |
| 6 | Newcastle | 22 | 38 |
| 7 | Bournemouth | 22 | 37 |
| 8 | Aston Villa | 22 | 36 |
| 9 | Brighton | 22 | 34 |
| 10 | Fulham | 22 | 33 |
| 11 | Brentford | 22 | 28 |
| 12 | Palace | 22 | 27 |
| 13 | Manchester U | 22 | 26 |
| 14 | West Ham | 22 | 26 |
| 15 | Tottenham | 22 | 24 |
| 16 | Everton | 21 | 20 |
| 17 | Wolves | 22 | 16 |
| 18 | Ipswich | 22 | 16 |
| 19 | Leicester | 22 | 14 |
| 20 | Southampton | 22 | 6 |
