indierich06
Active Member
Is "very, very average" better or worse than just "average"?
It is the same. I felt his average-ness needed excentuating somehow though.
Is "very, very average" better or worse than just "average"?
It is the same. I felt his average-ness needed excentuating somehow though.
No no, you should accentuate (or indeed excentuate) the positive.
Never put Veet on your plums. Scroll down for the review. http://www.amazon.co.uk/Veet-Men-Hair-Removal-Creme/dp/B000KKNQBK
I'd just like to take the opportunity to thank you for this.
Million quid up front and a million to pay next year
Most bizarre deal ever
No no, you should accentuate (or indeed excentuate) the positive.
I know it's only The Mockery reporting it, but apparently the move is now on 'the brink of collapse':
The same article also says we're definitely not after Heskey either apparently.
I wonder how many League One & Two / Blue Square Bet Premier / Yeovil & District League Division One players you'd need to include in your calculations to consider Matt Mills the average of a given sample if you also include Premier League and legitimately talented Championship players.
Taking part on a horse in a one horse race should suit him.http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/footba...t-mills-as-bolton-deal-stalls-86908-23901253/
Celtic back in the frame, prob just paper talk
Taking part on a horse in a one horse race should suit him.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 20 | 47 |
2 | Arsenal | 21 | 43 |
3 | Nottm F | 21 | 41 |
4 | Newcastle | 21 | 38 |
5 | Chelsea | 21 | 37 |
6 | Manchester C | 21 | 35 |
7 | Aston Villa | 21 | 35 |
8 | Bournemouth | 21 | 34 |
9 | Fulham | 21 | 30 |
10 | Brentford | 21 | 28 |
11 | Brighton | 20 | 28 |
12 | West Ham | 21 | 26 |
13 | Tottenham | 21 | 24 |
14 | Palace | 21 | 24 |
15 | Manchester U | 20 | 23 |
16 | Everton | 20 | 17 |
17 | Ipswich | 20 | 16 |
18 | Wolves | 21 | 16 |
19 | Leicester | 21 | 14 |
20 | Southampton | 20 | 6 |