Blue Maniac
Alzheimers sufferer
S n o w f l a k e
Yes. That's exactly what it is. When you go back to school on Monday have them teach you the difference between questioning someone's opinion or merely pointing out why some comparisons aren't in anyway valid to a discussion.Neee naaarr neeee naaarrr neee naaaarrr its the ****ing opinion police.
Oh and in reply, we gave Ranieri, a very experienced manager, loads of money to spend. That went swimmingly well, didn't itI don't think anyone wants to get on Rob's back. I've no design on that. I don't boo anyone because I don't believe it is a good way to support.
I maintain though in my opinion that giving someone who has never managed at this level before us the most amount of money any manager in the history of LCFC has ever had is a mistake and it will end badly.
In footballing terms it would be a disaster to spend big, increase our wage bill vastly, and then be relegated eventually because we could not recruit the necessary experience to cement ourselves as a PL team. We perhaps have the best chance we are ever going to have to stop the yoyo and be a consistent top 10 club. We will not achieve that on our present course (in my opinion).
I don't understand your logic. Just because we gave a manager who helped us to win the league money and it did not work out, it follows that we should give the most amount of money we have given to any manager in the history of the club to Someone with no prior experience of management. Is that what you are saying? Does that sound bat shit crazy to anyone else?Oh and in reply, we gave Ranieri, a very experienced manager, loads of money to spend. That went swimmingly well, didn't it
In your opinion officer.Yes. That's exactly what it is. When you go back to school on Monday have them teach you the difference between questioning someone's opinion or merely pointing out why some comparisons aren't in anyway valid to a discussion.
I don't understand your logic. Just because we gave a manager who helped us to win the league money and it did not work out, it follows that we should give the most amount of money we have given to any manager in the history of the club to Someone with no prior experience of management. Is that what you are saying? Does that sound bat shit crazy to anyone else?
If he doesn't it is further cause to argue that we should have a proper manager.Do you think Shakespeare decides how we spend the money?
I thought it was the Managers job to decide who would be the best players to bring into the club.
I'll answer that. Yes, he does. Therein lies the problem.Do you think Shakespeare decides how we spend the money?
Conte has supposedly said Drink water is not his signing. So maybe not.I thought it was the Managers job to decide who would be the best players to bring into the club. The 'Management' then decide the best price to get him/them in at, with the advice of the manager, "He is not worth more than £20million", or whatever?
Theres no way on God's Earth that Luiz was either. So definitely not.Conte has supposedly said Drink water is not his signing. So maybe not.
Theres no way on God's Earth that Luiz was either. So definitely not.
They have one.They should get a proper manager.
But but but..... He doesn't sign his own players....They have one.
Arsenal have been also rans since they last won it in 2004. Spurs and Liverpool have never won the Premier league, so therefore must be also rans.
Not too bad a company to keep
Are Blackburn Rovers also also rans?
Rhetorical question Boc?Are Blackburn Rovers also also rans?
Erm.... That's the answer to a question I didn't ask. I was being facetious.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 11 | 28 |
2 | Manchester C | 11 | 23 |
3 | Chelsea | 11 | 19 |
4 | Arsenal | 11 | 19 |
5 | Nottm F | 11 | 19 |
6 | Brighton | 11 | 19 |
7 | Fulham | 11 | 18 |
8 | Newcastle | 11 | 18 |
9 | Aston Villa | 11 | 18 |
10 | Tottenham | 11 | 16 |
11 | Brentford | 11 | 16 |
12 | Bournemouth | 11 | 15 |
13 | Manchester U | 11 | 15 |
14 | West Ham | 11 | 12 |
15 | Leicester | 11 | 10 |
16 | Everton | 11 | 10 |
17 | Ipswich | 11 | 8 |
18 | Palace | 11 | 7 |
19 | Wolves | 11 | 6 |
20 | Southampton | 11 | 4 |