RHYDAL
Well-Known Member
Youth, defensive organisation, energy, intolerance of fools, celibacy and aquaducts.Unbelievable! What the hell is Pearson going to bring that Sven didn't have?
Youth, defensive organisation, energy, intolerance of fools, celibacy and aquaducts.Unbelievable! What the hell is Pearson going to bring that Sven didn't have?
All very antsy tonight?
A vaguer-ant?I love ants, they're great aren't they? If I was an ant, I'd be one of those ants that kinda just runs around a lot and looks really busy, but never really goes anywhere
To be fair, it's working for Man City.
It's true that spending money on good players and a good manager doesn't automatically mean you get a good team.
Nevertheless, I believe we have good, well-intentioned owners and a great squad of talented players more than capable of getting promotion and staying in the Premier League with additions when we get there.
All we need is a manager who can bring results and Sven clearly wasn't going to deliver. I'm just not convinced Nigel Pearson would either.
A vaguer-ant?
Deliverants?All very antsy tonight?
And you are flecking blinded by the glamour of sven FFS Pearson turned this club around won the league one title and got into the play offs in his two seasons, what did Sven achieve in his year with us....spent countless millions and left us ten places higher than when he left. Football flecking genius that man....
Really? I'd say we are almost certainly in a hell of a lot more debt, probably tens of millions more, than we were under Pearson.
Yes but let's be honest, you are guessing and at the end of the day like to think you know more than you actually do.
Surely I can't be the only person who thinks that with the information we are given this doesn't all quite add up that we should be spending the way we are doing and there's something more than a little risky going on here? I can't be the only person who wants to be reassured that our owners actually have more money than that?
You do like to come across as an arrogant mr know-it-all though
Quite right.I don't think he does at all, far from it. All I see is a passionate, intelligent fan asking pertinent questions. Nothing arrogant in that.
Honestly, I'm glad that we have a chance to do well here, but I'm also concerned, after what happened to the club only 9 or 10 years ago with regards to administration, that someone who, to the only knowledge any of us seem to have, has a net worth of ~£120mil is spending tens of millions on us a year.
Call it guesswork if you like, write me off as a pessimist or someone who is trying to act smart and "likes to think he knows more than he does" if you like, but I care about this club and the last thing I want to see is us go under. Surely I can't be the only person who thinks that with the information we are given this doesn't all quite add up that we should be spending the way we are doing and there's something more than a little risky going on here? I can't be the only person who wants to be reassured that our owners actually have more money than that?
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 11 | 28 |
2 | Manchester C | 11 | 23 |
3 | Chelsea | 11 | 19 |
4 | Arsenal | 11 | 19 |
5 | Nottm F | 11 | 19 |
6 | Brighton | 11 | 19 |
7 | Fulham | 11 | 18 |
8 | Newcastle | 11 | 18 |
9 | Aston Villa | 11 | 18 |
10 | Tottenham | 11 | 16 |
11 | Brentford | 11 | 16 |
12 | Bournemouth | 11 | 15 |
13 | Manchester U | 11 | 15 |
14 | West Ham | 11 | 12 |
15 | Leicester | 11 | 10 |
16 | Everton | 11 | 10 |
17 | Ipswich | 11 | 8 |
18 | Palace | 11 | 7 |
19 | Wolves | 11 | 6 |
20 | Southampton | 11 | 4 |