Frank Lampard has gone to Coventry?About the same time as it's pronounced that it's Frank Lampard's Coventry City
The bloke in the flat above. Because he actually exists. I've seen him taking the bins out.Are you referring to the resident of the floor above you, or God?
**** mePaul Merson:
“He had three games, he beat Leicester twice so it’s not a bad audition is it? They probably thought he was the one that beat them and not Man United.
“It will be interesting, let’s be honest, if he wasn’t at Man Utd for those few games, he stayed on and did well, he wouldn’t be getting this job so hopefully he takes advantage of it.
“Good luck to him, he was a top, top player and hopefully he can turn Leicester around. Do I think Leicester can get turned around? No, I don’t think they can, I think they will be relegated, I have watched them too many times this season and I don’t see them staying up.”
All well and good Paul, but.. he had four games in charge of United.. oh and he had a job managing another team before that.
What about Cambiasso?European Cups:
Martin O’Neill 2
Paulo Sousa 2
Ruud van Nistelrooy 0
Frank McLintock won the Fairs CupWhat about Cambiasso?
Weird one to pick out since he also won the league & fa cup double (back when that was a thing that astonished people)Frank McLintock won the Fairs Cup
I’m sure there are a lot of people who will agree with his sentiment and views though (aside from his inaccuracies around career and number of games). ‘Pisshead twat’ is also a little uncalled for given his well documented difficulties !**** me
The unfettered wisdom of Paul Merson.
How the useless **** actually manages to maintain a regular gig with a major broadcaster is beyond me. The competition for places must be non existent (actually yes, it clearly is as Sherwood has the same gig)
Pisshead twat.
He's already in Wikipedia's list of LCFC managersBest thing I've seen today View attachment 19185
Well, as it says, he was a top, top player so we must be lucky to have him.Paul Merson:
“He had three games, he beat Leicester twice so it’s not a bad audition is it? They probably thought he was the one that beat them and not Man United.
“It will be interesting, let’s be honest, if he wasn’t at Man Utd for those few games, he stayed on and did well, he wouldn’t be getting this job so hopefully he takes advantage of it.
“Good luck to him, he was a top, top player and hopefully he can turn Leicester around. Do I think Leicester can get turned around? No, I don’t think they can, I think they will be relegated, I have watched them too many times this season and I don’t see them staying up.”
All well and good Paul, but.. he had four games in charge of United.. oh and he had a job managing another team before that.
And our problem is most of it is still here.BR had no shortage of funds made available to him, his downfall was bringing in mediocrity.
I’m sure there are a lot of people who will agree with his sentiment and views though (aside from his inaccuracies around career and number of games).
WOTS is there's been a hiccup in proceedings and some arguments over who has overall control on player contracts. Ruud is requesting more power than perhaps LCFC are willing to offer him.He's not coming is he?
That's what I thought, but just wanted to check.The bloke in the flat above. Because he actually exists. I've seen him taking the bins out.
He'll either be wrong or he'll be right. Its a 50/50 call. But either way it'll have nothing to do with any insight on his part.I’m sure there are a lot of people who will agree with his sentiment and views though (aside from his inaccuracies around career and number of games). ‘Pisshead twat’ is also a little uncalled for given his well documented difficulties !
WOTS is there's been a hiccup in proceedings and some arguments over who has overall control on player contracts. Ruud is requesting more power than perhaps LCFC are willing to offer him.
haahahaahahaSounds about right.
This seems to have been the problem with manager after manager (I believe same was reported with Potter in the summer). Surely our board should learn?
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 14 | 35 |
2 | Chelsea | 15 | 31 |
3 | Arsenal | 15 | 29 |
4 | Manchester C | 15 | 27 |
5 | Nottm F | 15 | 25 |
6 | Aston Villa | 15 | 25 |
7 | Brighton | 15 | 24 |
8 | Bournemouth | 15 | 24 |
9 | Brentford | 15 | 23 |
10 | Fulham | 15 | 23 |
11 | Tottenham | 15 | 20 |
12 | Newcastle | 15 | 20 |
13 | Manchester U | 15 | 19 |
14 | West Ham | 15 | 18 |
15 | Everton | 14 | 14 |
16 | Leicester | 15 | 14 |
17 | Palace | 15 | 13 |
18 | Ipswich | 15 | 9 |
19 | Wolves | 15 | 9 |
20 | Southampton | 15 | 5 |