Biffa Bacon
Well-Known Member
The point of the first statement is that the Thais, as owners, have the right to take the club in whatever direction they may choose. We fans are a fickle bunch, we complain when financial results show that our team owes half the national debt, but rub our hands when yet another overpaid 'star' signs on the dotted line.
You say that high expenditure is not the norm in modern football: how many of these lower league teams are operating to a profit? Spending may lack a few noughts, in comparison to the Premier League, but very few professional clubs, in this country, are particularly well run.
On your final idea, that our owners "go away" and give the club to the fans: how would they be able to service the current debt?
Football relies on the fact that we are not a fickle bunch, we turn up, pay our money and moan a bit even when the clubs are being run by morons, it's some of the owners that are a fickle bunch, chucking money at their new toy until they get fed up of not being in the champions league and decide to withdraw their 'charity'. The Thai's may be the only game in town now but the fans will still be here long after they have moved on.